Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like a way to be able to configure disabling CVE entirely (not download trivy DB at all) at 1st run.
The use case I have is the following:
- airgapped environment
- need a UI for operators
- need to use S3-compatible storage
Currently, enabling remote storage S3 requires CVE be disabled.
CVE scanning is usually handled elsewhere by someone else, so it's fine if Zot doesn't do it itself.
But, currently the only way to disable CVE is to disable the search extension itself.
(correct me if I'm wrong here)
And If I disable search extension, UI extension must also be disabled, and these two are something I don't want to disable.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to enable the UI and Remote Storage together.
Just disabling CVE while keeping UI/Search & remote storage enabled will be fine.
If the application doesn't support this right now, can you put this in the roadmap somewhere?
Describe alternatives you've considered
One of the reasons I am considering switching to Zot is because I'm trying to reduce the number of containers I run to host a private registry.
(it's either this, or CNCF Distribution + a separate UI, or Nexus+Postgres, which I'm trying to avoid going back to)
Additional context
No response
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like a way to be able to configure disabling CVE entirely (not download trivy DB at all) at 1st run.
The use case I have is the following:
Currently, enabling remote storage S3 requires CVE be disabled.
CVE scanning is usually handled elsewhere by someone else, so it's fine if Zot doesn't do it itself.
But, currently the only way to disable CVE is to disable the search extension itself.
(correct me if I'm wrong here)
And If I disable search extension, UI extension must also be disabled, and these two are something I don't want to disable.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to enable the UI and Remote Storage together.
Just disabling CVE while keeping UI/Search & remote storage enabled will be fine.
If the application doesn't support this right now, can you put this in the roadmap somewhere?
Describe alternatives you've considered
One of the reasons I am considering switching to Zot is because I'm trying to reduce the number of containers I run to host a private registry.
(it's either this, or CNCF Distribution + a separate UI, or Nexus+Postgres, which I'm trying to avoid going back to)
Additional context
No response