Skip to content

Update TypeScript and typedoc #528

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Pike
Copy link
Contributor

@Pike Pike commented Mar 28, 2021

For #524, I'll want new TypeScript features, so updating TypeScript.
The new TypeScript requires a new typedoc. Which removed the setup we used to generated the docs (--mode=file) because it was duh.
Now the docs are actually for the exposed symbols of the module.

I've staged the generated documentation for this on https://pike.github.io/fluent.js/. The index.html is fake. The actual changes are in Pike@1847d1b, but that's big.

I reviewed each module, and I think the changes are good. The biggest difference was in langneg, where filterMatches dropped from the docs. I wasn't comfortable about that, so I added it to the module exports.

TechDebt is beautiful.

For projectfluent#524, I'll want new TypeScript features, so updating TypeScript.
The new TypeScript requires a new typedoc. Which removed the setup
we used to generated the docs (--mode=file) because it was duh.
Now the docs are actually for the exposed symbols of the module.
@Pike Pike requested a review from zbraniecki March 28, 2021 17:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@zbraniecki zbraniecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Pike Pike merged commit bc796f8 into projectfluent:master Mar 29, 2021
@Pike Pike deleted the update-typescript branch March 29, 2021 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants