You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I put an API change in the wrong section of the whats new file in #1008. In case it's a more common misreading, I thought I should check how other packages label these sections.
pvlib:
API Changes with Deprecations
API Changes
Pandas:
Backwards incompatible API changes
Deprecations
Numpy:
Expired deprecations
Compatibility notes
Deprecations
C API changes
Changes
xarray:
Breaking changes
Deprecations
For pvlib, I think xarray's pattern is most appropriate. I don't like the similarity of pvlib's sections.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm OK with the xarray pattern for changes to function signatures and module content.
We may want a third category, for changes which cause functions to produce different results, either from fixing bugs or changing algorithms, e.g., filtering a clearsky model for unreasonable values and replacing with NaN.
I put an API change in the wrong section of the whats new file in #1008. In case it's a more common misreading, I thought I should check how other packages label these sections.
pvlib:
Pandas:
Numpy:
xarray:
For pvlib, I think xarray's pattern is most appropriate. I don't like the similarity of pvlib's sections.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: