Skip to content

Conversation

@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexrudd2 alexrudd2 commented Jul 21, 2023

See #1687 and #1685; those should be merged first.

We have decided that implicit Optional is OK already (example foo: Optional[bar] = None is
unnecessary). The typing.ClassVar rule also seems noisy.

Copy link
Collaborator

@janiversen janiversen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks

I learned something here, I did not know that !s worked.

@janiversen janiversen merged commit ac49b77 into dev Jul 21, 2023
@janiversen janiversen deleted the ruff branch July 21, 2023 06:37
@alexrudd2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I learned something here, I did not know that !s worked.

I didn't either :). The pyupgrade rules in ruff have taught me many new things! I'm also impressed with the subtle bugs it's starting to catch.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants