Skip to content

Conversation

@mayeut
Copy link
Member

@mayeut mayeut commented Mar 13, 2025

Towards #2047 (comment)

EOL images have very little usage.
Drop support for those images, they can still be used by directly pinning their full registry name.

This mostly has an impact on documentation & tests.

The mechanism to check deprecation has been kept which leads to the check being a bit redundant regarding image names.

mayeut added 2 commits March 19, 2025 10:01
Using multi-arch images directly messes with parallel tests for now.
Using them as a source for image tag ensures that all architecture specific tags are pointing to the same tag for a given manylinux / musllinux policy.
@mayeut mayeut force-pushed the remove-eol-manylinux branch from ed07338 to a723b83 Compare March 19, 2025 09:01
Copy link
Contributor

@joerick joerick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Just a minor simplification if you prefer it.

Co-authored-by: Joe Rickerby <[email protected]>
@henryiii henryiii merged commit 059d8ea into pypa:main Mar 22, 2025
25 checks passed
@mayeut mayeut deleted the remove-eol-manylinux branch March 22, 2025 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants