Skip to content

Discard in memory XML representation after done with a node (junitxml) #1074

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
nicoddemus opened this issue Sep 26, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Discard in memory XML representation after done with a node (junitxml) #1074

nicoddemus opened this issue Sep 26, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Labels
type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch

Comments

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

As commented in #1071, see if it is possible to serialize and discard the xml representation of a node after teardown report is processed, in order to conserve memory.
@nicoddemus nicoddemus added the type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch label Sep 26, 2015
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

this could also fix #641

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt self-assigned this Sep 29, 2015
RonnyPfannschmidt added a commit to RonnyPfannschmidt/pytest that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2015
@RonnyPfannschmidt
finalize nodereporters by throwing away the intermediate xml nodes, f…
04e0205 
…ixes issue pytest-dev#1074
@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2015
Merged
RonnyPfannschmidt added a commit to RonnyPfannschmidt/pytest that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2015
@RonnyPfannschmidt
finalize nodereporters by throwing away the intermediate xml nodes, f…
795a986 
…ixes issue pytest-dev#1074
RonnyPfannschmidt added a commit to RonnyPfannschmidt/pytest that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2015
@RonnyPfannschmidt
finalize nodereporters by throwing away the intermediate xml nodes, f…
518c88f 
…ixes issue pytest-dev#1074
@pytestbot pytestbot mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt

Labels
type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RonnyPfannschmidt @nicoddemus