Skip to content

in docs, recwarn.txt lacks any :ref: targets #297

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pytestbot opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

in docs, recwarn.txt lacks any :ref: targets #297

pytestbot opened this issue Apr 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch

Comments

@pytestbot
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported by: Alexander Dupuy (BitBucket: dupuy, GitHub: dupuy)

Whereas skipping.txt has several targets, e.g.:

.. _skip and xfail:

.. _skipping:

at the start of the file, with others as well, there are no targets at all in recwarn.txt, so it isn't possible to use intersphinx :ref: links to this documentation.
@pytestbot pytestbot added the type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch label Jun 15, 2015
pytestbot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2015
@flub
Merged in flub/pytest (pull request #297)
b09be4e 
Merge 2.7.1 release changes into default
@pfctdayelise pfctdayelise added type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor labels Jul 25, 2015
@decentral1se
Copy link
Contributor

Gonna try and do something with this one 🚀

@decentral1se decentral1se mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2016
Merged
fkohlgrueber pushed a commit to fkohlgrueber/pytest that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2018
@ambv
Consider stars in testlist_star_expr unpacking (because they are)
bbc09a4 
Fixes pytest-dev#297
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@pfctdayelise @decentral1se @pytestbot