Skip to content

drop versioneer and use setuptools_scm instead #1410

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

ocefpaf
Copy link
Member

@ocefpaf ocefpaf commented Nov 9, 2020

@Conengmo can you review this one and merge before #1409?

This was referenced Nov 9, 2020
@@ -92,5 +89,9 @@ def walk_subpkg(name):
extras_require={"testing": ["pytest"]},
install_requires=install_requires,
zip_safe=False,
cmdclass=versioneer.get_cmdclass(),
use_scm_version={
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't used scm before, so I can't really comment on this. I've been reading some docs, and they say to add setup_requires=['setuptools_scm'], here as well. https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm/#setuppy-usage If you're sure that this works as is then let's go ahead.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is correct but my next PR would remove it b/c I'm planning on adding a pyproject.toml to make folium pep 517/518 compliant.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, so this is merely an intermediate change. Go ahead then.

Co-authored-by: Frank <[email protected]>
@ocefpaf ocefpaf merged commit bca4853 into python-visualization:master Nov 13, 2020
@ocefpaf ocefpaf deleted the drop_versioneer branch November 13, 2020 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants