-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
Bytecodes cleanup: promote TIER_{ONE,TWO}_ONLY to properties #115778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
If someone wants to pick this up I'm happy to provide some clues as to where to make changes (but multi-file grep goes a long way. :-) |
I would like to pick this up if you don't mind :) |
@Eclips4 Go for it! Remember to run |
For the CI failures, see gh-115859. Once that's fixed, please merge the latest main and push again. |
This replaces the old `TIER_{ONE,TWO}_ONLY` macros. Note that `specialized` implies `tier1`. Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <[email protected]>
…ython#115815) This replaces the old `TIER_{ONE,TWO}_ONLY` macros. Note that `specialized` implies `tier1`. Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <[email protected]>
…ython#115815) This replaces the old `TIER_{ONE,TWO}_ONLY` macros. Note that `specialized` implies `tier1`. Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <[email protected]>
…ython#115815) This replaces the old `TIER_{ONE,TWO}_ONLY` macros. Note that `specialized` implies `tier1`. Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <[email protected]>
Instead of
I'd like to be able to write
Linked PRs
tierN
annotation for instruction definition #115815The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: