Case where LOAD_CONST and RETURN_VALUE are not combined into RETURN_CONST

[FranklinLiang]

Bug report

Bug description:

It is my understanding that a little while ago RETURN_CONST was added as a new instruction #101632
It is to replace cases where LOAD_CONST and RETURN_VALUE appear sequentially.

I was playing around with the bytecode and found that a case:

def func(x):
    return True if x else False

That has the following bytecode:

 2 LOAD_FAST                0 (x)
 4 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE        2 (to 10)
 6 LOAD_CONST               1 (True)
 8 RETURN_VALUE
10 LOAD_CONST               2 (False)
12 RETURN_VALUE

While a similar function:

def func(x):
    if x:
        return True
    else:
        return False

Produces this bytecode:

 2 LOAD_FAST                0 (x)
 4 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE        1 (to 8) 

 6 RETURN_CONST             1 (True)

 8 RETURN_CONST             2 (False)

It seems like the instructions LOAD_CONST and RETURN_VALUE are not being combined properly in the first case.

I have confirmed with some members of the python team that this is a small bug/optimization opportunity and I would like to take a swing at fixing it.

CPython versions tested on:

3.12

Operating systems tested on:

No response

Linked PRs

• gh-121246: LOAD_CONST optimizer now uses a helper function to get the next non-NOP instruction possibly in a following block #121305

[Eclips4]

Hi!
Since there's no longer a RETURN_CONST instruction (see #125837), I'm going to close this.