-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
gh-117999: Fix small integer powers of complex numbers #124243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
serhiy-storchaka
wants to merge
7
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
serhiy-storchaka:complex_powi
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+88
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f2280be
gh-117999: Fix small integer powers of complex numbers
serhiy-storchaka 5b5320a
Merge branch 'main' into complex_powi
serhiy-storchaka 1304423
Polish tests.
serhiy-storchaka bc4adfd
Remove unrelated change.
serhiy-storchaka 4b8535d
Merge branch 'main' into complex_powi
serhiy-storchaka e876273
Add more tests.
serhiy-storchaka bb748c7
Merge branch 'main' into complex_powi
serhiy-storchaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins/2024-09-19-15-47-50.gh-issue-117999.Iq4jEG.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
Fix calculation of powers of complex numbers. Small integer powers now produce correct sign of zero components. Negative powers of infinite numbers now evaluate to zero instead of NaN. | ||
Powers of infinite numbers no longer raise OverflowError. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks correct for me, given description of _Py_ADJUST_ERANGE2(). But what we gain here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without this,
complex(inf)**101
raised an OverflowError.There is no test for this, because the result (
(inf+nanj)
) is still incorrect -- it should be(inf+0j)
, as for smaller exponents.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not necessary, it's correct in C (no mixed-mode rules for cpow()). BTW, for small exponents we also got
(inf+nanj)
with this patch (even withn=2
).You are right,
(inf+0j)
seems to be better. But only iff we will use mixed-mode arithmetic rules for exponentiation, i.e.z**real == cmath.exp(real*cmath.log(z))
(where multiplication taken component-wise):Unfortunately, it's not easy to fix integer algorithm in such case.
I think the better road would be along #123283. We have two variants.
z**real
, that will also handle cases whenz
has special components if we kept also integer algorithm.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In any case it should not be OverflowError.