gh-117961: Fix grammar documentation for @ operator associativity #138847
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The binary arithmetic operations grammar incorrectly showed the @ operator as right-associative (m_expr "@" m_expr) while all other multiplicative operators are left-associative (m_expr "*" u_expr).
According to PEP 465, the @ operator should have the same associativity as *. The actual parser implementation in Grammar/python.gram correctly implements left-associativity, but the documentation was inconsistent.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--138847.org.readthedocs.build/