Skip to content

Conversation

@ZackerySpytz
Copy link
Contributor

@ZackerySpytz ZackerySpytz commented Feb 10, 2021

Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have Windows to test with, but I agree that PyCMethod_New should be part of the limited ABI.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ZackerySpytz for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @ZackerySpytz and @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.9 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker 8a8b5df93f379f561aab4f2fc5b2ad54f5009f7a 3.9

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I don't have Windows to test with, but I agree that PyCMethod_New should be part of the limited ABI.

I concur with @encukou. I merged the fix, thanks.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

@ZackerySpytz: can you please try to backport it manually to 3.9?

@ZackerySpytz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay, I will create a backport for 3.9.

ZackerySpytz added a commit to ZackerySpytz/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-24554 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

vstinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2021
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants