PEP 515: fix links#1973
Conversation
|
@skirpichev in regardes to what's in Python not matching the PEP, it would depend on how much it deviates and whether it's backwards-compatible since what's in the language now has been there for quite some time. |
Well, the PEP is clear: "The current proposal is to allow one underscore between digits, and after base specifiers in numeric literals." PEP also explicitly lists constructors in the stdlib, that allow this. Including the Decimal(). Which, however, accepts any number of underscores in any place.
Apparently, no. If you think there is something to do wrt the PEP text - please reopen the quoted above issue. |
|
That's definitely a bug in the |
|
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 09:30:31PM -0700, Georg Brandl wrote:
That's definitely a bug in the Decimal implementation. Whether to fix that
at this stage I'll leave to the maintainers of Decimal.
Well, apparently the Decimal maintainers (at least Mark) do
think - there is nothing to fix... Neither PEP, nor the decimal
implementation.
|
While working on https://bugs.python.org/issue44267 I've noticed some broken links (first commit). The second one fix links with redirects.
BTW, the stdlib implementation doesn't follow PEP. Is it ok?