Skip to content

feat: initial async redis cluster commands #12988

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

kangadrewie
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code:

cwltool (https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool)
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ cwltool/utils.py:46: note: ... from here:
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ cwltool/utils.py:46: note: ... from here:
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ cwltool/utils.py:46: note: ... from here:

schema_salad (https://github.com/common-workflow-language/schema_salad)
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ schema_salad/metaschema.py:131: note: ... from here:
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ schema_salad/metaschema.py:131: note: ... from here:
+ note: ... from here,
+ note: ... from here,
+ schema_salad/metaschema.py:131: note: ... from here:

@Avasam Avasam added the topic: redis Issues related to the redis third-party stubs label Nov 29, 2024
@Avasam Avasam mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
@srittau
Copy link
Collaborator

srittau commented Nov 29, 2024

Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, we are removing redis from typeshed. Please direct any improvements to the type annotations of the redis package to https://github.com/redis/redis-py/

@srittau srittau closed this Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: redis Issues related to the redis third-party stubs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants