Skip to content

refactor: update emoji package to 2.0.0 #8426

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 28, 2022
Merged

refactor: update emoji package to 2.0.0 #8426

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 28, 2022

Conversation

kkirsche
Copy link
Contributor

Fix: #8359

This updates the stubs for the emoji package to 2.0.0

Parts of the EMOJI_DICT could be TypeDict'd but I don't think there is support for the attribute may exist or may not exist to appropriately do that typing, so I've marked the inner-dict as Incomplete.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@kkirsche
Copy link
Contributor Author

The pyright failure was:

Run jakebailey/pyright-action@v1
Error: Error: read ECONNRESET

Fixed the missing at runtime error I had missed though

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood merged commit e48c176 into python:master Jul 28, 2022
@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

If you fancy tackling #8360, that would also be a very welcome PR :)

@kkirsche
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll take a look at what that requires. I think that'll be much more straightforward for me than trying to handle #4776, as I don't have enough experience with peewee to feel confident I'll get it right without starting them over from scratch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants