PR to improve the hash function for uuid

[theory-in-progress]

• This PR aims to measure the time overhead caused by the current hashing of store.config and hashing of the whole code in the template.

Additional context

Currently, uuid hashes only the current store.config, so any changes in store.config would change the uuid, but suppose we follow the steps:

1. Commit a template using x config with uuid: 53asdf
2. We then change the code in the python files, in the template, this would be reflected in the ui and won't affect the download zip option, but essentially there is no change in the store.config
3. We again try to commit a template using the same x config, so the uuid would be the same: 53asdf since the store.config is the same. This would not create a new commit like it should since we changed the py files, but fetches the template from the previous commit...

---

What is the purpose of this pull request?

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Other

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for code-generator ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	a0cb360
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/code-generator/deploys/64f6e64278ff830008296987
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-312--code-generator.netlify.app/
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[guptaaryan16]

Can you check if instead of parsing all files if we parse just the main.py file does this feature work(as I think for all options there is always a change in main.py file) and what can be the time advantages ?

[theory-in-progress]

For the previous code where we hashed the store.config we got a time difference around 1-2 milliseconds, but for the current PR Where we hash the whole code, we get a time difference of around ~5 milliseconds.

So considering this, if we hash only the main.py that still would range between 1-5 milliseconds, not much time difference I would say...

[vfdev-5]

LGTM, thanks @theory-in-progress !

Please make sure that CI is passing