-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 536
Skip annotate boolean input #2957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/2957
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit 4189e46 with merge base 7d4bafc ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55946526 |
Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55946526 |
Look good for me. Thanks for your help. |
Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Pull Request resolved: #2957 ghstack-source-id: 222193714 @exported-using-ghexport It only makes sense to quantize fp tensor, but not boolean. Add a check to make sure only fp tensor are annotated in quantizer Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/)
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55946526 |
Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D55946526 |
Pull Request resolved: #2957 ghstack-source-id: 222200589 @exported-using-ghexport It only makes sense to quantize fp tensor, but not boolean. Add a check to make sure only fp tensor are annotated in quantizer Differential Revision: [D55946526](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D55946526/)
This pull request has been merged in ce344bc. |
@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/0.2 -c critical |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #2957 ghstack-source-id: 222200589 exported-using-ghexport It only makes sense to quantize fp tensor, but not boolean. Add a check to make sure only fp tensor are annotated in quantizer Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D55946526 fbshipit-source-id: d94bfee38ab2d29fc9672ab631b4d5d0c5239d25 (cherry picked from commit ce344bc)
Cherry picking #2957The cherry pick PR is at #2999 and it is recommended to link a critical cherry pick PR with an issue Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2957 ghstack-source-id: 222200589 exported-using-ghexport It only makes sense to quantize fp tensor, but not boolean. Add a check to make sure only fp tensor are annotated in quantizer Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D55946526 fbshipit-source-id: d94bfee38ab2d29fc9672ab631b4d5d0c5239d25
* Skip annotate boolean input (#2957) Summary: Pull Request resolved: #2957 ghstack-source-id: 222200589 exported-using-ghexport It only makes sense to quantize fp tensor, but not boolean. Add a check to make sure only fp tensor are annotated in quantizer Reviewed By: jerryzh168 Differential Revision: D55946526 fbshipit-source-id: d94bfee38ab2d29fc9672ab631b4d5d0c5239d25 * fix lint
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Differential Revision: D55946526