Skip to content

Conversation

@radical
Copy link
Owner

@radical radical commented Dec 15, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Checklist

  • Is this feature complete?
    • Yes. Ready to ship.
    • No. Follow-up changes expected.
  • Are you including unit tests for the changes and scenario tests if relevant?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Did you add public API?
    • Yes
      • If yes, did you have an API Review for it?
        • Yes
        • No
      • Did you add <remarks /> and <code /> elements on your triple slash comments?
        • Yes
        • No
    • No
  • Does the change make any security assumptions or guarantees?
    • Yes
      • If yes, have you done a threat model and had a security review?
        • Yes
        • No
    • No
  • Does the change require an update in our Aspire docs?

- Add usage documentation link in error messages
- Handle locked issues/PRs (unlock before commenting, re-lock after)
- Reorder steps to verify permissions before adding reaction
- Add success reaction (rocket) on completion
- Mention user in failure comments for notification
- Fail silently when no valid command found (already filtered by job condition)
@radical
Copy link
Owner Author

radical commented Dec 15, 2025

/quarantine-test Aspire.Cli.Tests.CliOrphanDetectorTests.CliOrphanDetectorFallsBackToPidOnlyWhenStartTimeInvalid https://foo.com/

@github-actions
Copy link

⏳ Started quarantine operation for Aspire.Cli.Tests.CliOrphanDetectorTests.CliOrphanDetectorFallsBackToPidOnlyWhenStartTimeInvalid (will push to PR #21)... (workflow run)

…hanDetectorFallsBackToPidOnlyWhenStartTimeInvalid
@github-actions
Copy link

✅ Quarantine operation completed! Updated PR #21: #21

@radical radical mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2025
16 tasks
github-actions added 2 commits December 15, 2025 07:11
…rphanDetectorFallsBackToPidOnlyWhenStartTimeInvalid
…DetectorFallsBackToPidOnlyWhenStartTimeInvalid
@radical radical mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2025
1 task
@radical radical force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from c6e74da to 5382599 Compare December 15, 2025 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants