[TESTING] improved coverage slightly (- #53 -) #178
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Changes in file multicast/hear.py: - added another doctest Changes in file tests/test_fuzz.py: - re-enabled deadlines Changes in file tests/test_hear_server.py: - Implemented new test suite
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily enhance the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
Multicast
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #178 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 98.547% 99.272% +0.725%
=============================================
Files 7 7
Lines 413 412 -1
Branches 26 26
=============================================
+ Hits 407 409 +2
+ Misses 3 2 -1
+ Partials 3 1 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/test_hear_server.py (1)
116-170: Improve test methods organization and documentation.The test suite needs the following improvements:
- Add docstrings to test methods
- Extract common setup code to setUp method
- Standardize error messages
Here's the suggested implementation:
class HearUDPHandlerTestSuite(McastHearTestSuite): + def setUp(self): + """Set up test fixtures.""" + super().setUp() + self._fixture_port_num = self._the_test_port + self.assertIsNotNone(self._fixture_port_num) + self.assertIsInstance(self._fixture_port_num, int) + def test_handle_with_none_data_and_sock(self): + """Test handler behavior with None data and socket. + + Verifies that the handler returns early when both + data and socket are None. + """ - fail_fixture = str("""Handler(None, None) --> HEAR == error""") - _fixture_port_num = self._the_test_port - self.assertIsNotNone(_fixture_port_num) - self.assertIsInstance(_fixture_port_num, int) + fail_fixture = """Handler(None, None) --> HEAR == error"""tests/test_fuzz.py (1)
172-172: Verify the rationale for the 2222ms deadline.The 2222ms deadline seems arbitrary. While it's good to re-enable deadlines as mentioned in the PR objectives, consider:
- Using a round number like 2000ms for better readability
- Adding a comment explaining why this specific duration was chosen
Consider adding a comment explaining the deadline choice:
@given(st.text(alphabet=string.ascii_letters + string.digits, min_size=56, max_size=2048)) -@settings(deadline=2222) +@settings( + # Allow up to 2 seconds for larger inputs (up to 2048 chars) to be processed + deadline=2000 +)multicast/hear.py (2)
417-423: Improve test case clarity and namingThe test case improves coverage by testing with a real socket, but has some areas for improvement:
- The test case name is duplicated (both are "Testcase 3")
- The description could better explain what aspect is being tested
Consider this improvement:
- Testcase 3: `handle` requires valid requests or ignores input. + Testcase 4: `handle` processes requests with valid socket correctly.
430-431: Consider using logging instead of print statementsUsing
isatty()for controlling debug output is a good start, but using Python's logging framework would provide more flexibility and control.Consider using logging:
- if (_sys.stdout.isatty()): # pragma: no cover - print(f"{self.client_address[0]} SAYS: {data.strip()} to ALL") + import logging + logging.debug(f"{self.client_address[0]} SAYS: {data.strip()} to ALL")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
multicast/hear.py(1 hunks)tests/test_fuzz.py(2 hunks)tests/test_hear_server.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
multicast/hear.py (1)
Pattern **/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
tests/test_fuzz.py (2)
Pattern **/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/test_hear_server.py (2)
Pattern **/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-21T04:40:19.258Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to keep un-mapped exit codes as they are until they are ready to be mapped.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T06:40:42.918Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/test_hear_server.py (2)
1-37: LGTM! Robust error handling in imports.
The file header and imports section demonstrates good practices:
- Proper error handling with CWE-758 references
- Early cleanup of error variables
- Appropriate handling of cyclic imports
172-173: LGTM! Standard unittest main block.
The main block follows the conventional unittest pattern.
tests/test_fuzz.py (2)
Line range hint 42-236: Test structure and documentation look good!
The test suite demonstrates:
- Clear and descriptive test method names
- Comprehensive docstrings explaining test purposes and assertions
- Proper use of Hypothesis for property-based testing
- Good error handling and cleanup practices
129-129: Consider adjusting the deadline value for CLI test.
The 300ms deadline for testing CLI invalid input handling might be too strict, especially on slower CI environments. This could lead to flaky tests.
Let's verify the execution time distribution:
✅ Verification successful
The 300ms deadline for CLI test is appropriate
After analyzing the test file, the 300ms deadline for test_invalid_Error_WHEN_cli_called_GIVEN_invalid_fuzz_input is reasonable because:
- The test performs a simple CLI validation with minimal operations
- It only checks for error messages in the output
- No network operations or complex computations are involved
- The input size is limited (3-15 characters)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the execution time distribution of the CLI test
# Expected: Most runs should complete well under 300ms to avoid flaky tests
# Test: Run the specific test multiple times and collect timing data
for i in {1..5}; do
python3 -m pytest tests/test_fuzz.py::HypothesisTestSuite::test_invalid_Error_WHEN_cli_called_GIVEN_invalid_fuzz_input -v --durations=0
done
Length of output: 1154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the test file to understand the context better
cat tests/test_fuzz.py
Length of output: 8388
- Fixed some typos - Added some docstrings Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
reactive-firewall
added
the
documentation
Changes in file .github/workflows/Tests.yml: - possible fix for always skipping cross-python testing in CI 🤷 ### ChangeLog: Changes in file .github/workflows/Tests.yml: jobs:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/Tests.yml (1)
677-677: LGTM with a minor suggestion for the error message.The command structure with proper error handling and waiting for background processes is well implemented. However, consider making the warning message more descriptive about the actual failure.
-sudo apt-get install --assume-yes python3.10 python3.11 || echo "::warning file=.github/workflows/Tests.yml,line=677,endLine=677,title=SKIPPED::SKIP Enhanced TOX Tests." ; +sudo apt-get install --assume-yes python3.10 python3.11 || echo "::warning file=.github/workflows/Tests.yml,line=677,endLine=677,title=SKIPPED::Failed to install Python versions for Enhanced TOX Tests." ;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/Tests.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
.github/workflows/Tests.yml (1)
Pattern .github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with GitHub's
${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals. - 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of valid
${{ ... }}syntax.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-11T21:15:37.121Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to use a centralized `EXIT_CODES` dictionary in Python scripts to standardize exit codes and messages as per CEP-8. This work is tracked in GH issue #117.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/__init__.py (1)
155-157: Consider adding docstrings for the new test suites.While the new test suites are properly added, it would be helpful to document their purpose in the module's docstring. This aligns with the project's guideline that undocumented definitions are considered incomplete.
Consider adding documentation like this to the module's docstring:
"""Multicast Testing Module. ... Test Suites: McastServerTestSuite: Tests the server's error handling functionality HearUDPHandlerTestSuite: Validates UDP handler's behavior with various inputs HearHandleNoneDataTestSuite: Tests handling of None data in request processing ... """tests/test_hear_server.py (3)
39-44: Add a docstring toMcastHearTestSuiteclass for clarity.The
McastHearTestSuiteclass lacks a docstring, which would help explain its purpose and usage in the test suite.You can add a docstring like this:
class McastHearTestSuite(context.BasicUsageTestSuite): + """Test suite for multicast hearing functionality."""
70-75: Add a docstring toMcastServerTestSuiteclass for clarity.Adding a docstring to the
McastServerTestSuiteclass will improve code readability and maintainability.You can add a docstring like this:
class McastServerTestSuite(McastHearTestSuite): + """Test suite for testing the multicast server functionality."""
133-138: Add a docstring toHearUDPHandlerTestSuiteclass for clarity.Including a docstring for the
HearUDPHandlerTestSuiteclass would provide a clear description of its purpose within the test suite.You can add a docstring like this:
class HearUDPHandlerTestSuite(McastHearTestSuite): + """Test suite for testing the HearUDPHandler's behavior."""
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
tests/__init__.py(3 hunks)tests/test_hear_server.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/__init__.py (2)
Pattern **/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/test_hear_server.py (2)
Pattern **/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when reviewing.
- Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini"
Pattern tests/*: When reviewing test code:
- Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to clarity when relevant.
- As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard (excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
- As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in CEP-8 and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any violations discovered.
- As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is important for posterity.
- As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string "test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption is documented.
- As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory, are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to) functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed that non-unit testing code is usually written as Bash shell scripts.
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T00:41:41.731Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to use only POSIX built-ins (like `printf` instead of `echo`) to align with CEP-8 conventions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-12T03:22:28.902Z
Learning: For future scripts, reactive-firewall prefers to keep the shebang line with an extra space (e.g., `#! /bin/bash`) as per project style.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/CI.md:32-32
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to keep the word "own" in headings when emphasizing the reader's personal test.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T03:15:05.171Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that when drafting or updating CEP documents, it's important to adhere to the project's standard format and include all relevant sections such as Motivation, Detailed Explanation, Implementation Guidelines, Impact, and References.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: docs/USAGE.md:66-66
Timestamp: 2024-09-17T03:38:28.677Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to use "Caveat" as a heading instead of "Caution".
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-09-24T01:03:10.574Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-11T21:15:37.121Z
Learning: For future reviews, remember that reactive-firewall prefers to use a centralized `EXIT_CODES` dictionary in Python scripts to standardize exit codes and messages as per CEP-8. This work is tracked in GH issue #117.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/__init__.py (2)
108-111: LGTM! New test module imports are well-organized.
The new test module imports are properly structured and align with the PR's objective of improving test coverage.
118-119: LGTM! Dependencies list properly updated.
The new test modules are correctly added to the dependencies list, maintaining code readability with appropriate line breaks.
tests/test_hear_server.py (1)
84-105: Remove unnecessary str() calls in fail_fixture variables.
The fail_fixture variables are already strings; wrapping them with str() is unnecessary and can be removed for cleaner code.
Also applies to: 109-130, 140-155, 169-186
1 task
reactive-firewall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
### ChangeLog: Changes in file .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml: jobs: Changes in file .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml: jobs:
reactive-firewall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
…SEC-2023-228 (- WIP PR #178 -) ### ChangeLog: Changes in file .github/workflows/Tests.yml: jobs: Changes in file Makefile: MANIFEST.in: init clean: clean-docs cleanup Changes in file docs/requirements.txt: setuptools>=75.0 Changes in file requirements.txt: Unknown Changes Changes in file tests/requirements.txt: pytest-enabler>=1.0.1 Changes in file tox.ini: alwayscopy = True passenv = recreate = True
This was referenced Nov 20, 2024
Closed
reactive-firewall
referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes in file multicast/hear.py:
Changes in file tests/test_fuzz.py:
Changes in file tests/test_hear_server.py:
Related Issues:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Nonevalues in request processing to prevent resource leaks.Tests
hear_serverfunctionality.