[PATCH] documentation #189

[reactive-firewall]

Documentation Maintenance

Related Issues 🏷️

• Closes Add input validation for DOCS_BUILD_REF environment variable #189
• Closes Expand error handling documentation and testing #186
• Closes v2.0.x Chore - More documentation improvements #208
• Closes v2.0.x Chore - Improve Documentation of CI configs #209

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a comprehensive Error Handling Guide to standardize practices across the project.
  • Updated documentation to clarify compatibility with UNIX systems.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced documentation for exception handling mechanisms, including detailed usage examples and guidelines.
  • Added new entries for "Release Notes" and "Exceptions in multicast" in the documentation.
  • Updated the usage documentation to reflect changes from version 1.4 to version 2.0.
  • Clarified licensing information for the logo and specific code sections.
  • Improved clarity and robustness of the documentation build configuration.
  • Added a logo to the README for enhanced visual presentation.

• Chores

  • Restructured the table of contents for improved navigation in the documentation.
  • Improved error handling mechanisms in the Makefile for better build process robustness.
  • Updated markdown linting configurations to allow specific inline HTML elements.
  • Added checks in the Makefile to ensure required directories exist before proceeding with builds.
  • Minor formatting adjustments in FAQ documentation for consistency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to configuration files for markdown linting, the introduction of a new error handling guide, and enhancements to exception handling documentation. Specifically, the .markdownlint.json and .markdownlint.yaml files have updated rules regarding inline HTML. A new file, docs/Exception_Guide.md, has been added to standardize error handling practices. Additionally, the docs/conf.py file now includes a function for validating Git references, and the documentation structure has been updated in docs/toc.md and multicast/exceptions.py.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.markdownlint.json	Rule MD033 changed from true to {"allowed_elements": ["details", "summary"]}.
.markdownlint.yaml	Rule MD033 updated to allowed_elements: ["details", "summary"]; rule MD034 explicitly set to false; line length rule MD013 adjusted to 100 characters.
docs/Exception_Guide.md	New document added detailing error handling mechanisms, exceptions, and best practices.
docs/conf.py	Added _validate_git_ref function for validating Git references; updated DOCS_BUILD_REF assignment.
docs/toc.md	Entry for /USAGE removed; entry for /Exception_Guide and Release Notes added.
multicast/exceptions.py	Enhanced documentation on exception handling; no changes to public entity signatures.
LICENSE.md	New acknowledgment for Logo.svg added; licensing text clarified for specific code sections.
Makefile	Updated to include checks for the existence of ./docs/ directory and improved error handling.
docs/Makefile	Simplified cleanup process for apidocs directory.
docs/USAGE.md	Updated version reference from 1.4 to 2.0 in usage examples.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Add input validation for DOCS_BUILD_REF environment variable (189)	✅
Expand error handling documentation and testing (186)	✅

Possibly related issues

• v2.0.x Chore - More documentation improvements #208: The documentation improvements in this PR may align with the ongoing efforts to enhance overall documentation quality.
• v2.0.x Chore - improve FAQ.md #205: The changes in the FAQ documentation could be relevant as they contribute to the general improvements in documentation clarity.

Possibly related PRs

• [FIX] Stability fix for error handling (- WIP #67 -) #69: The changes in the main PR regarding the .markdownlint.json and .markdownlint.yaml files, specifically the updates to rule MD033, relate to the documentation and formatting of markdown files, which could connect to the overall documentation improvements in this PR.
• [DOCUMENTATION] Minor update to project README #73: This PR focuses on documentation updates in the README.md, which may relate to the changes in markdown linting rules that affect how documentation is formatted.
• [DOCUMENTATION] Prototype documentation build glue #110: The changes in documentation build processes could be related to the updates in markdown linting rules, ensuring that the documentation is built correctly according to the new standards.

Suggested labels

Documentation

🐇✨
In the land of code where rabbits play,
New guides and rules have come to stay.
With HTML checks now set to clear,
Error handling shines, bringing cheer.
Hop along, dear devs, embrace the change,
For clearer paths, we now arrange!
🌟📜

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c54c4cc and 5bf5ace.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/toc.md (6 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• docs/toc.md

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.306%. Comparing base (39b1dd7) to head (5bf5ace).
Report is 48 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #228   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   99.306%   99.306%           
=========================================
  Files            7         7           
  Lines          432       432           
  Branches        31        31           
=========================================
  Hits           429       429           
  Misses           2         2           
  Partials         1         1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.10	99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.11	99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.12	99.306% <ø> (ø)
3.13	99.306% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest	99.306% <ø> (ø)
multicast	99.306% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest	99.306% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest	88.889% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
multicast/exceptions.py	100.000% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 39b1dd7...5bf5ace. Read the comment docs.

[reactive-firewall]

👍🏻 LGTM!

🟢 Automated Code Checks Passed

Note

• Code style is deemed acceptable (as per project configuration)
• Code Coverage is deemed acceptable (and test coverage is better than 50% on all key files)
• Dependency versions are current