[DOCUMENTATION] Draft for AI Usage Policy (- WIP #367 -) #415
Conversation
Additions with file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * Documentaed initial draft of AI policy to communicate impact on project
reactive-firewall
added
the
documentation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #415 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 95.056% 95.056%
=========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 2144 2144
Branches 131 131
=========================================
Hits 2038 2038
Misses 66 66
Partials 40 40
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughA new AI Usage Policy document has been added to the project. This policy outlines the permitted and prohibited uses of AI tools in the development workflow, establishes requirements for human oversight, and defines security and compliance protocols for AI-assisted contributions. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[misspelling] ~11-~11: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may prov...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~46-~46: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...encouraged in both cases, as Humans and AI alike, may later consider relevant proj...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[misspelling] ~59-~59: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are s...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~62-~62: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as r...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[uncategorized] ~101-~101: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...rge of pull-requests. * Every user (eg. AI, or human) must have a distinct code...
(E_G)
[duplication] ~112-~112: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[grammar] ~126-~126: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~143-~143: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...1 This policy will be reviewed: * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
5-5: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 280
(MD013, line-length)
11-11: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
12-12: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
13-13: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
14-14: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 173
(MD013, line-length)
15-15: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
16-16: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
17-17: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
18-18: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 154
(MD013, line-length)
26-26: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 163
(MD013, line-length)
28-28: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
29-29: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
34-34: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
35-35: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
36-36: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
42-42: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
43-43: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
44-44: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
45-45: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
46-46: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
46-46: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 133
(MD013, line-length)
47-47: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
48-48: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
48-48: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
52-52: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
53-53: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
53-53: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 214
(MD013, line-length)
59-59: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
60-60: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
61-61: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
62-62: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
62-62: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 125
(MD013, line-length)
63-63: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
67-67: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
68-68: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 5
(MD007, ul-indent)
69-69: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 124
(MD013, line-length)
75-75: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
76-76: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
76-76: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 182
(MD013, line-length)
76-76: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
78-78: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 219
(MD013, line-length)
79-79: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
79-79: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
81-81: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
82-82: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 3; Actual: 1
(MD005, list-indent)
82-82: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
83-83: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
84-84: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 3; Actual: 1
(MD005, list-indent)
84-84: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
85-85: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
89-89: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
90-90: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
91-91: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
92-92: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
93-93: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
97-97: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
98-98: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
99-99: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
101-101: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
102-102: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
108-108: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
109-109: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
110-110: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
111-111: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
112-112: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
113-113: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
114-114: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
115-115: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
119-119: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
120-120: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
121-121: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
122-122: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 3
(MD007, ul-indent)
126-126: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
127-127: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
128-128: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
132-132: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
134-134: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
135-135: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
136-136: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
137-137: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
141-141: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
143-143: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
144-144: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress
to Regressions
in Multicast Project
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * fixed use of "e.g." * fixed line length * related work Changes in file multicast/__init__.py: * fixed use of "e.g." Changes in file multicast/__main__.py: * fixed use of "e.g."
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * changed the indentation * related work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__main__.pymulticast/__init__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~54-~54: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...encouraged in both cases, as Humans and AI alike, may later consider relevant ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[misspelling] ~70-~70: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~73-~73: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[duplication] ~128-~128: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[grammar] ~142-~142: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~159-~159: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
57-57: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
90-90: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
95-95: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
95-95: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
97-97: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
98-98: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
100-100: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
- GitHub Check: makefile-lint
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (1)
33-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove trailing colon in heading
The heading "### 2.2 Prohibited AI Roles 🚫" ends with a colon. Remove the trailing colon to adhere to heading conventions (no trailing punctuation).- ### 2.2 Prohibited AI Roles :no_entry_sign: + ### 2.2 Prohibited AI Roles :no_entry_sign:Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
multicast/__init__.py (1)
455-458: Approve abbreviation correction
The abbreviation “eg.” has been updated to “e.g.” in the blockquote for_MCAST_DEFAULT_PORT, improving standardization and readability.multicast/__main__.py (1)
639-642: Approve abbreviation correction
The abbreviation “eg.” was correctly updated to “e.g.” in themaindocstring.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
641-641: Unused blanket
noqadirectiveRemove unused
noqadirective(RUF100)
* these changes are related to GHI #367 Changes in file .coderabbit.yaml: * related work (added missing commas) * no functional change Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * style fixes * added missing commas Changes in file multicast/__init__.py: * related work (added missing commas) Changes in file multicast/__main__.py: * related work (added missing commas)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
multicast/__init__.py (1)
466-468: Approve punctuation improvement in blockquote.The comma after “e.g.” correctly follows the abbreviation and aligns with previous feedback on blockquote formatting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.coderabbit.yaml(5 hunks).github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__init__.pymulticast/__main__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T08:43:45.804Z
Learning: When creating bash scripts or tools, follow the code style and conventions of existing `tests/check_*` scripts and `tests/check_spelling`, ensuring they are placed appropriately in the `tests/` directory as per project conventions. (e.g. [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/3d2bd3cf37f87974df6f7bee31a05a89) and [CEP-7](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/123b8a45f1bdeb064079e0524a29ec20).)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: tox.ini:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T01:55:08.999Z
Learning: In the multicast project, `docs/conf.py` is picked up by the unittest module during test discovery, causing errors when some imports fail. To prevent this, `docs/requirements.txt` is included in the base dependencies in `tox.ini`.
multicast/__main__.py (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: multicast/__main__.py:631-632
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:05:38.192Z
Learning: Before suggesting documentation updates in `multicast/__main__.py`, verify whether the changes are already addressed in the diff to avoid unnecessary suggestions.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[misspelling] ~71-~71: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~74-~74: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[duplication] ~130-~130: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[grammar] ~144-~144: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~161-~161: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
99-99: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
100-100: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
102-102: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
🔇 Additional comments (29)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (23)
1-4: Clear title and section heading
The document’s title and the “Purpose and Scope” heading are well-structured and clear. The blank lines enhance readability.
10-13: Approve section introduction
The “AI Role Definitions” section and its subheading are clearly written and follow consistent Markdown conventions.
14-25: Approve permitted AI roles list
The list of permitted AI roles is well-formatted, with logical grouping and consistent indentation. Descriptions are concise and clear.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...(EN_A_VS_AN)
26-29: Approve caution blockquote
The CAUTION block correctly warns against AI auto-application to protected branches. Formatting and context are appropriate.
38-40: Approve warning blockquote
The WARNING block appropriately reinforces that AI alone should not serve as a sole approver. Presentation is consistent.
41-45: Approve additional prohibited roles
Items 2.2.C and 2.2.D clearly outline the security gatekeeper and auto-merge restrictions. Formatting is solid.
46-49: Approve PR review process heading
The “PR Review Process” heading and subheading are clear and correctly positioned.
50-58: Approve human review requirements
The list under “3.1 Required Human Review” clearly communicates the policy for standard and large PRs. Indentation and emphasis are consistent.
59-61: Approve note blockquote
The NOTE block adds valuable context about the current maintainer situation. Formatting is correct with surrounding blank lines.
62-66: Approve review conventions link
Item 3.1.D correctly references the external CEP-4 document. Link formatting and list styling are appropriate.
67-73: Approve AI-assisted code review section
The “3.2 AI Assisted Code Review” section succinctly describes the supplementary nature of AI reviews. Presentation is consistent.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~71-~71: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...(EN_A_VS_AN)
74-77: Approve AI troubleshooting guidelines
The guidance for handling AI failures (e.g., throttling) is clear and actionable. Indentation is correct.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~74-~74: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
78-83: Approve large PR handling
Items under “3.3 Large PR Handling” correctly advise splitting large PRs or providing summaries. Formatting is consistently applied.
85-92: Approve security verification list
The verification and validation steps (4.1.A) clearly enforce line-by-line review. The phrasing “NO ‘Vibe-coding’” is on-brand and emphasizes caution.
93-98: Approve tip blockquote
The TIP block provides a pragmatic reminder from Steve McConnell, with proper attribution using~. Formatting and nesting are correct.
99-104: Approve security assessment items
Items 4.1.B and 4.1.C outline signed commits and additional security reviews for AI fixes. These are well-articulated.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
99-99: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2(MD007, ul-indent)
100-100: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0(MD005, list-indent)
102-102: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0(MD005, list-indent)
105-112: Approve branch protection rules
The list under “4.2 Branch Protection” accurately describes required rules. Style and indentation are consistent.
113-121: Approve dual-approval system details
The “4.3 CWE-655 Mitigation” section clearly explains the dual-approval system and identity separation. Formatting is solid.
122-134: Approve implementation and compliance
Section 5 (“Implementation and Compliance”) and its configuration subsections are concise, with clear references to the relevant files.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~130-~130: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
135-141: Approve monitoring and reporting
Items 5.2.A and 5.2.B provide a robust audit and incident-reporting process. List styling is correct.
142-147: Approve developer training
The training requirements are well-defined, listing onboarding and communication steps. Formatting is consistent.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~144-~144: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...(A_NNS)
148-156: Approve exceptions to policy
The “Exceptions” section clearly specifies the approval process and scope restrictions. Style and indentation align with the rest of the document.
157-163: Approve policy review schedule
Section 7 outlines review triggers after incidents or integration changes. Headings and list items are well-formatted.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~161-~161: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...(EN_A_VS_AN)
multicast/__main__.py (1)
654-654: Punctuation consistency in docstring
The addition of the comma after “e.g.” correctly aligns with the project’s documentation style and enhances readability..coderabbit.yaml (5)
29-29: Approve comma after “e.g.” in BASH file instruction.Adding the comma enhances readability and matches standard punctuation.
44-44: Approve comma after “e.g.” in acceptance tests instruction.Consistent use of the comma after the abbreviation improves grammatical correctness.
59-59: Approve comma insertion after “e.g.” in Python file extension note.This change maintains uniform style across instructional examples.
170-170: Approve comma after “e.g.” in requirements file reference.Ensures consistent punctuation in path instructions.
195-195: Approve punctuation fix for “e.g.” in docs review step.Aligns with proper usage of the abbreviation and keeps documentation consistent.
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * minor style fix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (1)
161-163: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use “An” before vowel-sound words
In item 7.1.A, replace “After any security incident involving AI tools” with “After an security incident…” to follow “An” before a vowel sound.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~161-~161: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...(EN_A_VS_AN)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.coderabbit.yaml(5 hunks).github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__init__.pymulticast/__main__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T08:43:45.804Z
Learning: When creating bash scripts or tools, follow the code style and conventions of existing `tests/check_*` scripts and `tests/check_spelling`, ensuring they are placed appropriately in the `tests/` directory as per project conventions. (e.g. [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/3d2bd3cf37f87974df6f7bee31a05a89) and [CEP-7](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/123b8a45f1bdeb064079e0524a29ec20).)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: tox.ini:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T01:55:08.999Z
Learning: In the multicast project, `docs/conf.py` is picked up by the unittest module during test discovery, causing errors when some imports fail. To prevent this, `docs/requirements.txt` is included in the base dependencies in `tox.ini`.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~54-~54: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...encouraged in both cases, as Humans and AI alike, may later consider relevant ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[misspelling] ~71-~71: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~74-~74: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[duplication] ~130-~130: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[grammar] ~144-~144: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~161-~161: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
99-99: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
100-100: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
102-102: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
multicast/__init__.py (1)
467-467: Punctuation consistency: comma after “e.g.”
The added comma after “e.g.” in the docstring aligns with the project-wide grammatical conventions (see CEP-7) and improves readability.multicast/__main__.py (1)
654-656: Punctuation consistency: comma after “e.g.”
Updating the example to “e.g.,tuple(int(exit_code), None)” enhances grammatical correctness and matches other docstring fixes across the codebase..coderabbit.yaml (5)
29-29: Grammar fix: comma after “e.g.”
Added a comma after “e.g.” in the BASH file verification instruction for correct punctuation.
44-44: Grammar fix: comma after “e.g.”
Inserted a comma after “e.g.” in the minimal acceptance tests instruction to improve clarity.
59-59: Grammar fix: comma after “e.g.”
Added a comma after “e.g.” in the Python file change instruction to maintain consistency.
170-170: Grammar fix: comma after “e.g.”
Inserted a comma after “e.g.” in the base requirements.txt reference for clearer documentation.
195-195: Grammar fix: comma after “e.g.”
Added a comma after “e.g.” in the docs review instruction, aligning with other punctuation corrections..github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (2)
26-28: Blockquote emphasis is clear and effective
The CAUTION block clearly conveys that AI cannot apply changes to protected branches, using**NOT**for emphasis. The formatting (blank lines before/after, proper nesting) is correct.
119-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionFix list indentation under 4.3.A
The nested bullets under “4.3.A dual-approval system” mix indent levels. Ensure two spaces per nesting level:- * 4.3.A dual-approval system - * Every user (e.g., AI or human) ... + * 4.3.A dual-approval system + * The project implements a dual-approval system to prevent single points of failure. + * Every user (e.g., AI or human) must have ...This makes the hierarchy explicit and consistent.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * removed extra comma * added note to better clearify 4.3.A * fixed large PR threshold at more than 99 changed files for consistancy * realated work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (2)
16-18: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Clarify and tighten acronym usage in project-management delegation
The phrase “GHI (GitHub issues), as well as open new, or comment on existing, GHI” is a bit awkward and uses “GHI” before defining it clearly. Consider introducing the full term first, dropping the extra comma, and then using the acronym, for example:- * 2.1.B Assistive Project-Management Delegation: - * AI may provide feedback when requested on GHI (GitHub issues), as well as open new, or comment - on existing, GHI, to track suggested improvements to the project content. + * 2.1.B Assistive Project-Management Delegation: + * AI may provide feedback when requested on GitHub issues (GHIs) and may open new or comment on + existing GHIs to track suggested improvements to project content.
32-35: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refine “LLM type AI” phrasing for clarity
“LLM type AI” can be ambiguous. Consider using “LLM-based AI” or “large-language-model AI” for precision, and normalize casing (e.g., lowercase “no vibe-coding”):- * 2.2.A Sole Developer: - * AI (especially LLM type AI) is not well suited for innovation; No vibe-coding, the direction - and development of the project CANNOT meaningfully come from AI. + * 2.2.A Sole Developer: + * AI (especially LLM-based AI) is not well suited for innovation; no “vibe-coding”—project + direction and development cannot meaningfully come from AI.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.coderabbit.yaml(5 hunks).github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__init__.pymulticast/__main__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T08:43:45.804Z
Learning: When creating bash scripts or tools, follow the code style and conventions of existing `tests/check_*` scripts and `tests/check_spelling`, ensuring they are placed appropriately in the `tests/` directory as per project conventions. (e.g. [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/3d2bd3cf37f87974df6f7bee31a05a89) and [CEP-7](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/123b8a45f1bdeb064079e0524a29ec20).)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: tox.ini:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T01:55:08.999Z
Learning: In the multicast project, `docs/conf.py` is picked up by the unittest module during test discovery, causing errors when some imports fail. To prevent this, `docs/requirements.txt` is included in the base dependencies in `tox.ini`.
multicast/__main__.py (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: multicast/__main__.py:631-632
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:05:38.192Z
Learning: Before suggesting documentation updates in `multicast/__main__.py`, verify whether the changes are already addressed in the diff to avoid unnecessary suggestions.
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~54-~54: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...encouraged in both cases, as Humans and AI alike, may later consider relevant ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[misspelling] ~71-~71: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~74-~74: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[typographical] ~125-~125: Consider adding a comma after ‘Fortunately’ for more clarity.
Context: ...identity was not controlled by a human. Fortunately these changes had > been limited to imp...
(RB_LY_COMMA)
[duplication] ~136-~136: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... for @dependabot configuration. * 5.1.C Changes * Changes to these configurations require PR appr...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[grammar] ~150-~150: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~167-~167: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
99-99: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
100-100: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
102-102: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
multicast/__main__.py (1)
654-654: Documentation punctuation standardized.The comma after “e.g.” has been correctly added to align with punctuation standards and existing project conventions. Great consistency improvement.
multicast/__init__.py (1)
467-467: Proper comma added after “e.g.” in blockquote.The comma after “e.g.” has been correctly inserted within the blockquote to match punctuation standards. Documentation is now consistent with project style.
.coderabbit.yaml (5)
29-29: Added missing comma after “e.g.”The comma after “e.g.” in the BASH file verification instruction has been correctly inserted for proper grammar and clarity.
44-44: Added missing comma after “e.g.”The comma after “e.g.” in the minimal acceptance tests instruction has been correctly inserted to improve readability.
59-59: Added missing comma after “e.g.”The comma after “e.g.” in the Python extension file instruction has been correctly added, aligning with style guidelines.
170-170: Added missing comma after “e.g.”The comma after “e.g.” in the requirements.txt instruction has been correctly added for proper punctuation.
195-195: Added missing comma after “e.g.”The comma after “e.g.” in the documentation linting instruction has been correctly inserted, ensuring consistency with project conventions.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (2)
26-29: Blockquote formatting looks good
The caution block is properly separated by blank lines and uses the[!CAUTION]callout correctly. The content clearly warns against AI applying changes to protected branches without human oversight.
115-120: Dual-approval system section is clear
This block clearly outlines the dual-approval requirements. The “(e.g., AI or human)” parenthetical and list indentation are consistent.
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * new section for defining acronyms * improvements based on review (- WIP PR #415 -) * related work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (1)
33-34: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Clarify and correct pluralization in project-management delegation
The phrase “open new, or comment on existing, GHI” is awkward and singular. Pluralize “GHIs” and remove unnecessary commas to improve readability.- * AI may provide feedback when requested on GitHub issues (GHIs), as well as open new, or comment - on existing, GHI, to track suggested improvements to the project content. + * AI may provide feedback when requested on GitHub issues (GHIs) and may open new or comment on + existing GHIs to track suggested improvements to the project content.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.coderabbit.yaml(5 hunks).github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__init__.pymulticast/__main__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T08:43:45.804Z
Learning: When creating bash scripts or tools, follow the code style and conventions of existing `tests/check_*` scripts and `tests/check_spelling`, ensuring they are placed appropriately in the `tests/` directory as per project conventions. (e.g. [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/3d2bd3cf37f87974df6f7bee31a05a89) and [CEP-7](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/123b8a45f1bdeb064079e0524a29ec20).)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: tox.ini:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T01:55:08.999Z
Learning: In the multicast project, `docs/conf.py` is picked up by the unittest module during test discovery, causing errors when some imports fail. To prevent this, `docs/requirements.txt` is included in the base dependencies in `tox.ini`.
multicast/__main__.py (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: multicast/__main__.py:631-632
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T19:05:38.192Z
Learning: Before suggesting documentation updates in `multicast/__main__.py`, verify whether the changes are already addressed in the diff to avoid unnecessary suggestions.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (4)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:89-96
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T18:43:17.245Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers the current documentation structure in AI_USAGE_POLICY.md where TIP blockquotes can appear within/after nested list items, rather than grouping all nested bullets together before introducing blockquotes. The mixed structure is intentionally preferred over strictly separated list-then-blockquote formatting.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T18:50:59.341Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers conciseness over verbosity in documentation when the meaning is already clear, and considers suggestions that add unnecessary verbosity to be nitpicky rather than helpful improvements.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:89-99
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T19:05:32.820Z
Learning: In AI_USAGE_POLICY.md, reactive-firewall intentionally uses "abrupt breaks" in list structures (like TIP blockquotes interrupting nested list items) to create emphasis and draw reader attention to critical concepts like the anti-vibe-coding principle. The interruption is designed to create impact and should not be "fixed" for formatting consistency.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:74-76
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T19:24:13.567Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain formal/verbose wording in policy documents rather than simplified, concise phrasing, as demonstrated in the AI Usage Policy document where they chose to keep "When AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as requiring additional attention" over a more concise alternative.
</retrieved_learning>
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[grammar] ~15-~15: Two determiners in a row. Choose either “A” or “The”.
Context: ...ity. ### 1.2 Definitions 📖 * 1.2.A The following acronyms and abbreviations ar...
(DT_DT)
[misspelling] ~30-~30: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[misspelling] ~87-~87: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~90-~90: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[typographical] ~141-~141: Consider adding a comma after ‘Fortunately’ for more clarity.
Context: ...identity was not controlled by a human. Fortunately these changes had > been limited to imp...
(RB_LY_COMMA)
[grammar] ~166-~166: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~183-~183: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
115-115: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
116-116: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
118-118: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
multicast/__main__.py (1)
654-654: Punctuation improvement: Comma added after "e.g." to align with style guidelines (CEP-7) in themaindocstring.multicast/__init__.py (1)
467-467: Documentation consistency: Fixed punctuation by adding a comma after "e.g." within the comment for_MCAST_DEFAULT_PORT..coderabbit.yaml (5)
29-29: Punctuation consistency: Added comma after "e.g." in the BASH file verification instruction for clarity.
44-44: Punctuation consistency: Added comma after "e.g." in the minimal acceptance tests instruction for readability.
59-59: Punctuation consistency: Added comma after "e.g." in the Python file extension check to standardize formatting.
170-170: Punctuation consistency: Added comma after "e.g." in the requirements.txt path instruction for correctness.
195-195: Punctuation consistency: Added comma after "e.g." in the documentation linting instruction to maintain uniform style.
* these changes are related to GHI #367 Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * cleanup for merging * related work Changes in file tests/check_spelling: * related work
Changes in file .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md: * added missing 'e' to use noun form
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Regressions
to Resolved
in Multicast Project
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
multicast/__init__.py (1)
467-467: Excellent punctuation correction!The addition of the comma after "e.g." follows proper English punctuation rules and improves documentation clarity. This addresses the previous review feedback and aligns with the project's documentation standards.
multicast/__main__.py (1)
654-654: Proper punctuation correction applied.The comma after "e.g." improves the docstring's readability and follows standard English punctuation rules. This change addresses previous review feedback and maintains consistency with similar corrections made throughout the codebase.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (1)
116-119: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Unify punctuation in list‐item titles
The list titles for 4.1.B and 4.1.C omit trailing colons, whereas other 4.1.X items use them. For consistency, consider adding colons:- * 4.1.B Signed Commits + * 4.1.B Signed Commits: * Code signing with different keys for human vs. AI contributions is required. - * 4.1.C Security Assessments + * 4.1.C Security Assessments: * AI-suggested security fixes must undergo additional human security review.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
116-116: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0(MD005, list-indent)
118-118: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0(MD005, list-indent)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.coderabbit.yaml(5 hunks).github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md(1 hunks)multicast/__init__.py(1 hunks)multicast/__main__.py(1 hunks)tests/check_spelling(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
`tests/*`: When reviewing **test** code: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do ...
tests/*: When reviewing test code: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements
to clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes
for code style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any
violations discovered.
4. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-9
and evaluate suggested changes for nomenclature compliance, pointing out any
violations discovered, along with suggestions generated to correct the nomenclature.
5. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
6. As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string
"test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing
code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the
project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption
is documented.
7. As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the
string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory,
are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any
type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to)
functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed
that non-unit testing code is usually (but not always) written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/check_spelling
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
multicast/__init__.pymulticast/__main__.py
`.github/**`: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates, and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree. * 'actionlint' err...
.github/**: * When the project is hosted on GitHub: All GitHub-specific configurations, templates,
and tools should be found in the '.github' directory tree.
- 'actionlint' erroneously generates false positives when dealing with
GitHub's${{ ... }}syntax in conditionals.- 'actionlint' erroneously generates incorrect solutions when suggesting the removal of
valid${{ ... }}syntax.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#373
File: docs/utils.py:30-39
Timestamp: 2025-04-21T23:37:00.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers explicit domain allowlists (adding specific domains/subdomains individually) over pattern-based domain validation for security reasons, following the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle for security implementations.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#184
File: tests/test_hear_keyboard_interrupt.py:70-70
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T02:25:25.684Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to include suggested code changes or fixes in the issue's description when requested.
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T08:43:45.804Z
Learning: When creating bash scripts or tools, follow the code style and conventions of existing `tests/check_*` scripts and `tests/check_spelling`, ensuring they are placed appropriately in the `tests/` directory as per project conventions. (e.g. [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/3d2bd3cf37f87974df6f7bee31a05a89) and [CEP-7](https://gist.github.com/reactive-firewall/123b8a45f1bdeb064079e0524a29ec20).)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#110
File: tox.ini:25-25
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T01:55:08.999Z
Learning: In the multicast project, `docs/conf.py` is picked up by the unittest module during test discovery, causing errors when some imports fail. To prevent this, `docs/requirements.txt` is included in the base dependencies in `tox.ini`.
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md (4)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:89-96
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T18:43:17.245Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers the current documentation structure in AI_USAGE_POLICY.md where TIP blockquotes can appear within/after nested list items, rather than grouping all nested bullets together before introducing blockquotes. The mixed structure is intentionally preferred over strictly separated list-then-blockquote formatting.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T18:50:59.341Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers conciseness over verbosity in documentation when the meaning is already clear, and considers suggestions that add unnecessary verbosity to be nitpicky rather than helpful improvements.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:89-99
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T19:05:32.820Z
Learning: In AI_USAGE_POLICY.md, reactive-firewall intentionally uses "abrupt breaks" in list structures (like TIP blockquotes interrupting nested list items) to create emphasis and draw reader attention to critical concepts like the anti-vibe-coding principle. The interruption is designed to create impact and should not be "fixed" for formatting consistency.
</retrieved_learning>
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:74-76
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T19:24:13.567Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain formal/verbose wording in policy documents rather than simplified, concise phrasing, as demonstrated in the AI Usage Policy document where they chose to keep "When AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as requiring additional attention" over a more concise alternative.
</retrieved_learning>
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
[grammar] ~15-~15: Two determiners in a row. Choose either “A” or “The”.
Context: ...ity. ### 1.2 Definitions 📖 * 1.2.A The following acronyms and abbreviations ar...
(DT_DT)
[misspelling] ~30-~30: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... Roles 💁 * 2.1.A Assistive Code Review: * AI may provi...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~49-~49: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ....2.A Sole Developer: * AI (especially LLM based AI) is not well suited for innovation; ...
(BASED_HYPHEN)
[misspelling] ~87-~87: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ... ### 3.2 AI Assisted Code Review * 3.2.A AI Review Purpose * AI reviews are su...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
[style] ~90-~90: This wording can make your sentence hard to follow. Try rephrasing for improved clarity.
Context: ...n AI review is triggered but fails (e.g., due to throttling), the PR must be marked as ...
(DUE_TO_BECAUSE)
[typographical] ~141-~141: Consider adding a comma after ‘Fortunately’ for more clarity.
Context: ...identity was not controlled by a human. Fortunately these changes had > been limited to imp...
(RB_LY_COMMA)
[grammar] ~166-~166: The plural noun “Contributors” cannot be used with the article “A”. Did you mean “A contributor” or “Contributors”?
Context: ...els. ### 5.3 Developer Training * 5.3.A Contributors should understand the limitations of AI...
(A_NNS)
[misspelling] ~183-~183: Use “An” instead of ‘A’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...7.1 This policy will be reviewed * 7.1.A After any security incident involving A...
(EN_A_VS_AN)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
.github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md
115-115: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 2
(MD007, ul-indent)
116-116: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
118-118: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 2; Actual: 0
(MD005, list-indent)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/check_spelling (1)
159-160: Good addition of regression test cases.The new typo pairs follow the established format and will help prevent these specific spelling errors from reoccurring. The attribution to issue #415 provides good traceability, and both typos are legitimate corrections that enhance the project's quality assurance.
.coderabbit.yaml (5)
29-29: Punctuation Correction: Comma after "e.g."
Adding a comma after "e.g." improves readability and aligns with the style used elsewhere in the project.
44-44: Punctuation Correction: Comma after "e.g."
The comma insertion after "e.g." ensures consistency and clarity in the instruction list.
59-59: Punctuation Correction: Comma after "e.g."
This change maintains grammatical consistency by placing a comma after "e.g." within the parenthetical.
170-170: Punctuation Correction: Comma after "e.g."
Inserting the comma after "e.g." enhances the readability of the path description.
195-195: Punctuation Correction: Comma after "e.g."
The added comma after "e.g." in the documentation instruction aligns with the project's punctuation standards.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Resolved
to Regressions
in Multicast Project
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Regressions
to Resolved
in Multicast Project
Patch Notes
Introduces an enumeration of the unspoken policy for AI usage for the Multicast Project.
Impacted GHI
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit