Minor typographical fix

[reactive-firewall]

Patch Notes

Fixed some typographical

Impacted GHI

• None

Included and Superseded PR/MRs

• Includes and Supersedes Improved FAQ documentation some more #429

Changes By File

Changes in file multicast/main.py:

• Fixed typo found, but regressed in Improved FAQ documentation some more #429

Changes in file tests/context.py:

• Fixed typo found, but regressed in Improved FAQ documentation some more #429

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Corrected minor spelling errors in comments and test assertion messages.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 794f02f and 9f69369.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• multicast/__main__.py (1 hunks)
• tests/context.py (1 hunks)

 ______________________________________________
< Making your bugs an offer they can't refuse. >
 ----------------------------------------------
  \
   \   \
        \ /\
        ( )
      .( o ).

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate Unit Tests

• Create PR with Unit Tests
• Commit Unit Tests in branch HOTFIX-spelling-209a7
• Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 794f02f..9f69369. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Python	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Python
Branch Coverage	92.4%	92.4%
Composite Coverage	96.5%	96.5%
Line Coverage	96.8%	96.8%
New Branch Coverage	100%	100%
New Composite Coverage	100%	100%
New Line Coverage	100%	100%

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[reactive-firewall]

@codecov-ai-reviewer review

[codecov-ai]

On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly.

[codecov-ai]

PR Description

This pull request addresses minor but important code quality issues by correcting spelling errors in comments and docstrings. The goal is to improve the overall readability and maintainability of the codebase.

Click to see more

Key Technical Changes

The key technical changes involve correcting the spelling of 'aoutomaticly' to 'automatically' in the multicast/__main__.py file and 'efectivly' to 'effectively' in the tests/context.py file. These changes directly impact the clarity of the comments and error messages within the affected files.

Architecture Decisions

There are no architectural decisions involved in this pull request. The changes are limited to correcting spelling errors.

Dependencies and Interactions

This pull request does not introduce any new dependencies or affect interactions with other parts of the system. The changes are localized to the specific lines where the spelling errors were corrected.

Risk Considerations

There are minimal risks associated with this pull request. The changes are simple spelling corrections and are unlikely to introduce any functional regressions. However, it's always good practice to run tests to ensure that the changes haven't inadvertently introduced any issues.

Notable Implementation Details

The implementation details are straightforward, involving direct text replacement of the misspelled words with their correct spellings. Reviewers should pay attention to the context of the changes to ensure that the corrections are appropriate and do not alter the intended meaning of the comments or error messages.

[reactive-firewall]

👍 LGTM;

Note

with caveat: I am the project owner/admin and was this PR's author and I self-reviewed.