Skip to content

fix #1906 - implement BITFIELD_RO #1988

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022
Merged

Conversation

leibale
Copy link
Contributor

@leibale leibale commented Feb 15, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1988 (bf28616) into master (23991f7) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1988      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.94%   94.95%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         358      359       +1     
  Lines        3342     3349       +7     
  Branches      409      409              
==========================================
+ Hits         3173     3180       +7     
  Misses         85       85              
  Partials       84       84              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/client/lib/commands/BITFIELD.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
packages/client/lib/cluster/commands.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/client/lib/commands/BITFIELD_RO.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 23991f7...bf28616. Read the comment docs.

@Didas-git Didas-git mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2022
3 tasks
@leibale leibale merged commit 9180b91 into redis:master Mar 2, 2022
@leibale leibale deleted the 1906-bitfield_ro branch March 7, 2022 15:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants