feature: add support for ErrorVisibilityTimeout and job retention #573
Conversation
Remove unused PHP test files and cleaned op the remaining ones Added options error_visibility_timeout and retain_failed_jobs to SQS driver Locked opentelemetry docker image to a version that works with tests Created common method for Nack to deduplicate code Adjusted durability test from GreaterThan to Equal Fixed wrong order of expected vs. actual param in some tests
Fix yaml newline Reword some comments
Make reused error string a constant
Adjust error message change if-else to switch
nickdnk
added
bug
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the SQS workflow configurations, schema definitions, and job handling logic. Key modifications include the addition of concurrency settings, environment variables, and adjustments to job parameters in various YAML configuration files. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
# Conflicts: # tests/go.mod # tests/go.sum
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
…ined in configuration Include prefetch as the param to ReceiveMessage Ensure prefetch is within allowed limits
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
|
This must be merged before roadrunner-server/jobs#135 or tests in main repo will fail schema validation. |
Done, thanks @nickdnk 👍 |
fail fast if test parameters are missing Only create header map if required
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-stat.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-15: Document the removed configuration parameters.Several configuration parameters have been removed (relay, relay_timeout, num_pollers, pipeline_size, allocate_timeout, destroy_timeout). These changes might impact existing deployments.
Consider:
- Adding a migration guide for users updating from previous versions
- Documenting any new default values or alternative configuration methods
- Updating the changelog to reflect these breaking changes
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare_fifo.yaml (1)
Documentation update needed for configuration changes
The verification reveals that the configuration changes are significant and not properly documented:
- The README.md only contains a link to external documentation
- The old parameters (relay, relay_timeout, num_pollers, pipeline_size) have been removed from the configuration
- The new configuration structure in
sqsjobs/config.goshows a completely different set of parameters focusing on AWS SQS-specific settingsAction items:
- Update the external documentation at docs.roadrunner.dev
- Add a migration guide in the repository's README.md
- Document the new configuration parameters:
- visibility_timeout
- error_visibility_timeout
- retain_failed_jobs
- wait_time_seconds
- prefetch
- message_group_id
- and other AWS SQS-specific settings
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-17: Documentation update needed for configuration changes.Several configuration parameters have been removed (relay, relay_timeout, num_pollers, pipeline_size, etc.). Please ensure these changes are reflected in the documentation and CHANGELOG.md, explaining:
- Which parameters were removed and why
- How to migrate from the old configuration format
- Where the removed settings should be configured now (if applicable)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if changes are documented echo "Checking for documentation updates..." rg -i "configuration|settings|parameters" CHANGELOG.md # Look for any remaining uses of old parameters echo "Checking for old parameter usage in other config files..." fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg -i "relay_timeout|pipeline_size|allocate_timeout|destroy_timeout"Length of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation files in different locations echo "Searching for documentation files..." fd -t f -e md # Check for configuration examples and docs echo "Searching for configuration examples..." fd -e yaml -e yml # Look for old parameter references in code echo "Checking for old parameter references in code..." rg -i "relay_timeout|pipeline_size|allocate_timeout|destroy_timeout" -g "!tests/*" # Check for documentation in code comments echo "Checking for documentation in code comments..." rg -i "configuration|settings|parameters" -g "*.go" -g "*.md"Length of output: 1565
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of README.md for configuration documentation echo "Checking README.md content..." cat README.md # Check the old vs new configuration structure echo "Checking old vs new configuration examples..." cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare_fifo.yaml echo "---" cat tests/env/docker-compose-sqs-local.yaml # Check for configuration-related code changes echo "Checking configuration struct..." cat sqsjobs/config.goLength of output: 9001
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_respond_with_count.php (1)
1-1: Add PHPDoc documentation for test clarity.The test file would benefit from clear documentation explaining its purpose and expected behavior.
Add this documentation at the start of the file:
<?php +/** + * Test file for verifying SQS message receive count functionality. + * + * This test simulates a failing consumer that tracks how many times + * a message has been received through the ApproximateReceiveCount header. + * Each message is intentionally nack'd to trigger redelivery. + */tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_bad_resp.php (1)
14-15: Consider enhancing error reporting with additional context.While the current error reporting is functional, consider including more context in the error message to aid debugging.
- $rr->error((string)$e); + $rr->error(sprintf('[Bad Response Test] %s: %s', get_class($e), $e->getMessage()));tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init.yaml (1)
24-26: Document the performance implications of configuration changes.The changes look good and appear to optimize resource usage:
- Reduced
prefetch(1000 → 10) prevents memory overload- Increased
wait_time_seconds(0 → 10) reduces API calls through long-pollingConsider adding a comment in the file or updating documentation to explain:
- Why these specific values were chosen
- The performance implications of these settings
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-attr.yaml (1)
24-27: Improved SQS configuration parametersThe changes to the pipeline configuration show good improvements:
- Reduced prefetch (10) is more appropriate for testing and prevents memory pressure
- Increased wait_time_seconds (10) implements long polling, reducing API calls and costs
- Queue naming correctly follows FIFO requirements with proper attributes
For production environments, consider tuning these values based on:
- Message processing time
- Desired throughput
- Cost considerations (API calls)
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init-br.yaml (1)
9-9: Document credential management approachThe empty SQS configuration block suggests credentials are managed externally (e.g., through environment variables or IAM roles). Consider adding a comment or documentation to clarify how credentials should be configured in different environments.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-pq.yaml (1)
25-27: Improved SQS configuration parameters.The changes to the pipeline configuration show good practices:
- Reduced
prefetchvalue is more suitable for testing and prevents memory overhead- Increased
wait_time_secondsenables long polling, which reduces API calls and associated costsConsider documenting these values in comments, explaining:
- Why prefetch=10 is suitable for testing
- The benefits of wait_time_seconds=10 for long polling
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo.yaml (2)
36-37: Consider unique MessageGroupId per pipelineBoth pipelines share the same
message_group_id: 'RR'. While this works for testing, in production scenarios, consider using distinct MessageGroupIds if the pipelines process different types of messages or require separate ordering contexts.
Line range hint
1-43: Consider documenting SQS configuration requirementsThe configuration demonstrates good practices for SQS FIFO queues, but consider adding a README or comments explaining:
- Required AWS permissions and credential setup
- FIFO queue specific requirements (MessageGroupId, .fifo suffix)
- Rationale for configuration values (prefetch, wait_time_seconds)
This would help other developers understand the test setup and requirements.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo_auto_ack.yaml (1)
17-18: Consider increasing worker count for optimal throughput.With a prefetch count of 10 messages per pipeline and 2 FIFO queues, 2 workers might become a bottleneck. Consider increasing
num_workersto match or exceed the total prefetch capacity (20 messages) for optimal throughput.tests/configs/.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yaml (2)
Line range hint
9-13: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment.The addition of SQS credentials for testing is appropriate. However, the comment could be more descriptive.
-sqs: # credentials required for redial, or AWS SDK complains about missing credentials on init +sqs: # Test credentials required for redial functionality. AWS SDK requires credentials during initialization, + # even when using a local endpoint for testing.
40-41: Document the configuration differences between pipelines.Both pipelines have similar configurations except for the VisibilityTimeout attribute. Consider adding a comment explaining why test-2 pipeline doesn't need the VisibilityTimeout setting, to help other developers understand the test scenarios.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml (1)
38-43: Consider explicit VisibilityTimeout for consistency.While test-1 explicitly sets VisibilityTimeout to 10s, test-2 doesn't specify this attribute. For consistency and predictable behavior across test pipelines, consider either:
- Adding explicit VisibilityTimeout to test-2
- Documenting why test-2 uses default timeout
tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-127: Consider improving test reliability and documentation.While the test logic is sound, there are a few suggestions to enhance its robustness and maintainability:
- Consider replacing fixed sleep durations with polling/waiting for specific conditions to make the test more reliable.
- Add comments explaining the test strategy and what each phase is testing.
- Consider implementing proper queue cleanup after the test.
Here's a suggested improvement for the documentation:
func TestDurabilitySQS(t *testing.T) { + // This test verifies the system's ability to handle network disruptions when working with SQS: + // 1. Push messages during network failure (should be queued locally) + // 2. Restore network connection + // 3. Verify all messages are delivered and processed + // 4. Push more messages after recovery + // Expected: All messages should be processed exactly onceAnd for the sleep-based waits:
- time.Sleep(time.Second * 5) + // Helper function to wait for condition with timeout + waitForCondition := func(condition func() bool, timeout time.Duration) error { + start := time.Now() + for { + if condition() { + return nil + } + if time.Since(start) > timeout { + return fmt.Errorf("condition not met after %v", timeout) + } + time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) + } + } + + // Wait for proxy to be fully enabled and connection restored + err = waitForCondition(func() bool { + // Check if connection is established + return true // implement actual condition + }, 5*time.Second) + require.NoError(t, err)
SQS queues are not properly cleaned up after the test
The test uses SQS queues
sqs-durability-redial-1andsqs-durability-redial-2, but only callsDestroyPipelineswhich destroys the RPC pipelines. It doesn't callhelpers.DeleteQueues()to clean up the actual SQS queues, unlike other SQS tests in the codebase. This can lead to resource leaks.Add the following cleanup after
wg.Wait():helpers.DeleteQueues(t, "sqs-durability-redial-1", "sqs-durability-redial-2")🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-127: Verify queue cleanup implementation.The test should ensure proper cleanup of SQS queues after completion to prevent resource leaks.
Let's check if there's a queue cleanup implementation:
Let me check the test file to see if it's using the queue cleanup functionality:
Let me check what
DestroyPipelinesdoes and if it handles queue cleanup:
Let me check the configuration file to understand the queue names being used:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for queue cleanup implementation in test helpers # Test: Look for queue cleanup related code rg -A 5 "DeleteQueue|cleanup.*sqs|destroy.*queue" tests/Length of output: 5531
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the test file uses DeleteQueues or any cleanup mechanism rg -A 5 "test-1|test-2" tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.goLength of output: 797
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check DestroyPipelines implementation rg -A 10 "func DestroyPipelines" tests/helpers/Length of output: 711
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the SQS configuration cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yamlLength of output: 988
tests/jobs_sqs_fifo_test.go (1)
521-528: Consider using WaitGroup for goroutine synchronizationWhile the concurrent push operations are good for testing, using a WaitGroup would ensure all 15 goroutines complete before proceeding with the test cleanup.
Here's how you could modify this:
+ wg := &sync.WaitGroup{} + wg.Add(15) for i := 0; i < 15; i++ { go func() { + defer wg.Done() t.Run("PushPipelineFifo", helpers.PushToPipe("test-1", false, "127.0.0.1:6232")) t.Run("PushPipelineFifo", helpers.PushToPipe("test-2", false, "127.0.0.1:6232")) }() } + wg.Wait() time.Sleep(time.Second * 60)schema.json (2)
Line range hint
38-46: LGTM! Consider enhancing documentation for error handling configuration.The new properties
error_visibility_timeoutandretain_failed_jobsare well-structured and their relationship is clearly defined. The schema correctly enforces thaterror_visibility_timeoutis only meaningful whenretain_failed_jobsis true.Consider adding examples in the description to illustrate common use cases, such as implementing a dead-letter queue pattern with these settings.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
213-213: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
(aws-access-token)
🪛 checkov
[HIGH] 213-214: AWS Access Key
(CKV_SECRET_2)
Line range hint
210-223: Security: Revise credential examples to use placeholder format.While the current examples use clearly marked placeholders (e.g., "EXAMPLE"), it's recommended to use a more generic format that cannot be mistaken for real credentials.
Replace the credential examples with this format:
- "ASIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE" + "<YOUR_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID>" - "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY" + "<YOUR_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY>"🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
213-213: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
(aws-access-token)
🪛 checkov
[HIGH] 213-214: AWS Access Key
(CKV_SECRET_2)
sqsjobs/config.go (1)
183-189: Include 'SessionToken' in test environment variable checksIn the test mode environment setup, the
SessionTokenis used to establish AWS sessions that require temporary credentials. However, the code currently does not check ifRR_SQS_TEST_SESSION_TOKENis set. If a session token is necessary for your tests, consider adding this check to ensure all required credentials are present.Apply this diff to include the session token in the checks:
os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET") == "" || os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT") == "" || os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID") == "" { + os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SESSION_TOKEN") == "" { panic("security check: test mode is enabled, but not all sqs environment parameters are set") } c.Region = os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_REGION") c.Key = os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_KEY") c.Secret = os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET") c.Endpoint = os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT") + c.SessionToken = os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SESSION_TOKEN") }sqsjobs/item.go (1)
21-21: Suggestion: Clarify the alias for the standarderrorspackageWhile aliasing the standard
errorspackage asstderrcan help differentiate it from thegithub.1485827954.workers.dev/roadrunner-server/errorspackage, consider using a more descriptive alias likestdErrorsfor better readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (42)
- .github/workflows/linux.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/linux_durability.yml (1 hunks)
- schema.json (1 hunks)
- sqsjobs/config.go (4 hunks)
- sqsjobs/driver.go (3 hunks)
- sqsjobs/item.go (8 hunks)
- sqsjobs/listener.go (2 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-attr.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-auto-ack.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare_fifo.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yaml (3 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init-br.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init-br_fifo.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo_auto_ack.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-jobs-err.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-jobs-err_fifo.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-otel.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-pq.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-raw.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-read-approximate-count.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-stat.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/env/otel-collector-config.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
- tests/helpers/helpers.go (2 hunks)
- tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.go (1 hunks)
- tests/jobs_sqs_fifo_test.go (9 hunks)
- tests/jobs_sqs_test.go (19 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_bad_resp.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_create_memory.php (0 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_err.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_pq.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_queue_name_exist.php (0 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_sleep1.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_slow.php (0 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_slow_rand.php (0 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_respond_with_count.php (1 hunks)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_send.php (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_create_memory.php
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_queue_name_exist.php
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_slow.php
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_slow_rand.php
- tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_send.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
schema.json
213-213: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
(aws-access-token)
🪛 checkov
schema.json
[HIGH] 213-214: AWS Access Key
(CKV_SECRET_2)
🔇 Additional comments (75)
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok.php (1)
9-9: Verify the intentional removal of error handling around task acknowledgment.The error handling for task acknowledgment has been removed. While this aligns with the simplified approach mentioned in the PR summary, we should verify if this is the intended behavior for this test case.
Consider adding a comment explaining that this is a "happy path" test case without error handling, to make the test's purpose clear:
while ($task = $consumer->waitTask()) { + // Happy path test case - direct acknowledgment without error handling $task->ack(); }✅ Verification successful
Removal of error handling is consistent with test file patterns
Looking at the test files, we can see that:
- Multiple "happy path" test files (
jobs_ok.php,jobs_ok_pq.php,jobs_ok_sleep1.php) use directack()calls without error handling- Error handling with try-catch is only present in specific error test cases (
jobs_bad_resp.php)- Error scenarios are tested separately in dedicated files (
jobs_err.php,jobs_respond_with_count.phpwithnack)This indicates that the removal of error handling is intentional and follows the established pattern where:
- Happy path tests use direct acknowledgment
- Error scenarios are covered in separate, dedicated test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if other test files follow similar pattern of removing error handling # and if there's any documentation explaining this change # Look for similar job test files and their error handling patterns echo "Checking error handling patterns in other job test files:" rg -A 5 -B 5 "->ack\(\)" "tests/php_test_files/jobs/" # Look for documentation about error handling approach echo -e "\nChecking for documentation about error handling:" rg -l "error.*handling|exception.*handling" "docs/" "README.md"Length of output: 804
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to search for ack() calls and error handling patterns # Using simpler pattern without special characters # Look for ack calls in job test files echo "Checking ack patterns in job test files:" rg "ack\(" "tests/php_test_files/jobs/" # Look for try-catch blocks in the same directory echo -e "\nChecking error handling patterns:" rg "try|catch" "tests/php_test_files/jobs/" # Check if there are any other test files that might show the pattern echo -e "\nListing all files in jobs test directory:" ls -la tests/php_test_files/jobs/Length of output: 1345
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare.yaml (3)
Line range hint
1-17: Configuration structure looks good.The configuration maintains a clean structure with appropriate debug logging and worker pool settings for testing purposes.
Line range hint
1-17: Verify impact of removed configuration parameters.The configuration has been significantly simplified with several parameters removed. We should verify that:
- The removed timeouts don't affect error handling
- The removal of pipeline and worker configurations doesn't impact test reliability
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to removed parameters # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to removed parameters echo "Checking for references to removed parameters..." rg -l "relay_timeout|pipeline_size|allocate_timeout|destroy_timeout" tests/ # Test 2: Check test files for potential timing issues echo "Checking test files for timing assertions..." rg "sleep|usleep|timeout" tests/
9-9: Verify AWS credentials handling with empty SQS configuration.The empty SQS configuration suggests reliance on environment variables or AWS default credentials. While this is a more secure approach than hardcoding credentials, we should ensure:
- The test environment is properly configured
- Documentation reflects the credential requirements
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the SQS configuration and credentials handling.
Empty SQS configuration is valid - credentials handled via environment variables
The empty SQS configuration is intentional and correct. The test environment properly handles AWS credentials through environment variables:
- Tests use
RR_SQS_TEST_KEYenvironment variable withcredentials.NewStaticCredentialsProvider- Credential handling is consistently implemented across test files
- The simplified configuration aligns with security best practices by avoiding hardcoded credentials
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if documentation or other test files mention AWS credential requirements # Test 1: Search for AWS credential documentation echo "Searching for AWS credential documentation..." rg -l "AWS" --type md # Test 2: Check for environment variable usage in test files echo "Checking for AWS credential environment variables in tests..." rg "AWS_" --type php tests/Length of output: 1264
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for SQS configuration and credential handling # Look for SQS configuration patterns in test files echo "Checking SQS configuration patterns in tests..." rg "NewSQS|sqs\.Config" tests/ # Look for credential handling in test setup echo "Checking test setup for credential handling..." rg "credentials|\.rr-sqs" tests/ # Check for environment variable setup in test files echo "Looking for environment setup in test files..." fd "bootstrap" --type f --exec rg "environ|getenv|AWS" {}Length of output: 2400
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-stat.yaml (1)
9-9: Verify the empty SQS configuration behavior.The SQS configuration has been simplified to an empty object. This suggests that credentials and settings might be expected from environment variables or other sources.
Could you confirm:
- How users should now configure SQS credentials?
- If this change is documented in the README or configuration guide?
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is intentional and follows AWS best practices
The empty SQS configuration
{}is correct and intentional. The code shows that:
- When no configuration is provided, the system automatically assumes it's running in an AWS environment and uses default credentials from the environment
- This is explicitly logged: "No sqs plugin configuration section was found; assuming we're in AWS environment and want to use default values"
- For local testing, the system uses environment variables (RR_SQS_TEST_*) to override AWS credentials
- This approach aligns with AWS best practices of using environment-based credentials and IAM roles
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if documentation has been updated to reflect these changes rg -l "sqs.*credentials|sqs.*configuration" docs/ README.mdLength of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if there are any documentation files in the repository fd -t f "README|CONFIGURATION|DOCS|\.md$" -i # Then let's check for any SQS-related configuration examples rg -i "sqs.*credentials|sqs.*configuration|aws.*credentials|aws.*configuration" # Also check for any test files that might show the configuration usage fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg "sqs:"Length of output: 1702
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the schema.json for SQS configuration structure cat schema.json | jq -r '.properties.sqs' # Let's also check for any environment variable documentation or usage rg -A 3 "RR_SQS|AWS_" # Check the driver code for default behavior rg -A 5 "assumeAWSEnv" sqsjobs/Length of output: 3392
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-declare_fifo.yaml (1)
9-9: Verify the empty SQS configuration approach.The empty SQS configuration suggests credentials are now handled differently, possibly through environment variables. This is a good security practice, but we should ensure this change is properly documented and tested.
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is valid as credentials are handled via environment variables
Based on the test files analysis, the empty SQS configuration is intentional and correct. The credentials are properly managed through environment variables:
RR_SQS_TEST_KEYandRR_SQS_TEST_SECRETfor AWS credentialsRR_SQS_TEST_REGIONfor AWS regionRR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINTfor SQS endpointRR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_IDfor AWS account identificationThis approach aligns with security best practices by keeping sensitive credentials out of configuration files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if credentials are documented in README or environment setup echo "Checking for credential documentation..." rg -i "sqs.*credentials|aws.*credentials" README.md docs/ # Check for environment variable usage in test files echo "Checking for AWS credential environment variables in tests..." rg -i "aws.*key|aws.*secret|aws.*region" tests/Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any SQS or AWS configuration patterns in the codebase echo "Checking for SQS configuration patterns..." rg -i "sqs:|aws:" tests/configs/ rg -i "sqs:|aws:" .env.example .env.dist 2>/dev/null # Check for environment variable references in PHP test files echo "Checking for environment variables in test files..." rg -i "getenv|env\[" tests/ # Look for documentation in other common locations echo "Checking documentation in other locations..." fd -i readme -e md fd -i changelog -e mdLength of output: 1631
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the test configuration files to understand the changes echo "Checking other SQS configuration files in tests..." fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ -x cat {} # Let's also check the README content for any configuration documentation echo "Checking README content..." cat README.mdLength of output: 314
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-jobs-err.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-17: Review test coverage for removed configuration parameters.The configuration has been significantly simplified, removing several parameters mentioned in the AI summary (relay, timeout, pipeline_size, etc.). While this simplification might be intentional, we should ensure that error scenarios for these removed parameters are still tested elsewhere if they remain supported features.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for removed configuration parameters # Search for tests covering the removed parameters echo "Checking test coverage for removed parameters:" rg -l "relay_timeout|pipeline_size|allocate_timeout|destroy_timeout" tests/ # Check schema validation tests echo "\nChecking schema validation tests:" rg -l "schema.*validation|validate.*config" tests/
9-9: Verify the impact of empty SQS configuration on error testing.The simplified SQS configuration
{ }raises concerns about how credentials and connection parameters are now handled for error scenario testing.Consider documenting how SQS credentials should be provided (e.g., through environment variables) to ensure other developers can properly set up and run these tests.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-jobs-err_fifo.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-16: Verify impact of removed configuration parameters.Several important configuration parameters have been removed (relay, timeout, pipeline_size, etc.). Please ensure:
- Default values are properly documented
- Removal doesn't impact error handling (especially given this is an error test configuration)
- Job processing behavior remains consistent
Let's check for related test modifications:
#!/bin/bash # Look for test files that verify behavior with these settings rg -A 5 "jobs_err\.php" tests/ # Check for any error handling tests ast-grep --pattern 'func Test.*Error.*\(.*\) { $$$ }'
9-9: Document the expected SQS configuration source.The empty SQS configuration block suggests credentials and settings are managed elsewhere. Consider adding a comment to clarify where users should configure these settings (e.g., environment variables, external configuration).
Let's verify the documentation and default values:
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_sleep1.php (1)
9-10: Verify the intentional removal of error handling.The removal of the try-catch block around task processing could impact error visibility and task recovery. While this might be intentional as part of the ErrorVisibilityTimeout feature, please confirm:
- Is error handling being moved to a higher level?
- How will task failures be tracked and retried?
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok_pq.php (2)
9-10: Verify: Is removing error handling intentional?The removal of the try-catch block means that any exceptions during
sleep()or$task->ack()will now propagate up. While this might be intentional for testing ErrorVisibilityTimeout scenarios, it could make test failures harder to debug.Consider adding minimal error logging to help with debugging while still allowing exceptions to propagate:
- sleep(15); - $task->ack(); + try { + sleep(15); + $task->ack(); + } catch (Throwable $e) { + error_log("Error in jobs_ok_pq.php: " . $e->getMessage()); + throw $e; + }
9-9: Consider reducing sleep duration for faster testsA 15-second sleep in tests can significantly slow down the test suite. Unless this specific duration is required for testing visibility timeout scenarios, consider reducing it to improve test execution time.
tests/env/otel-collector-config.yml (2)
8-9: LGTM: Improved debugging capabilities with the official debug exporter.The switch from the deprecated 'logging' exporter to the official 'debug' exporter with detailed verbosity provides better debugging capabilities in the test environment.
17-17: LGTM: Consistent pipeline configuration.The exporters list has been correctly updated to use the new debug exporter while maintaining Zipkin as the primary tracing backend.
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_bad_resp.php (1)
12-16: LGTM! Clean error handling implementation.The error handling implementation follows PHP best practices with proper exception catching and reporting.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-raw.yaml (3)
24-25: Improved SQS polling configurationThe changes to
prefetchandwait_time_secondsare beneficial:
- Reduced prefetch value (10) is more appropriate for testing scenarios
- Increased wait time reduces API calls but may impact test duration
26-26: Verify queue name consistencyThe queue name has been changed to
sqs-raw-payload. Let's ensure this name is used consistently across tests and configurations.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of the new queue name # Look for any references to the old queue name 'resp-queue' or inconsistent usage of 'sqs-raw-payload' # Search for queue name references echo "Checking for old queue name usage..." rg "resp-queue" tests/ echo "Checking for new queue name usage..." rg "sqs-raw-payload" tests/
9-9: Verify AWS credentials configuration for testsThe empty SQS configuration suggests reliance on the AWS default credential chain. This is a good security practice, but we should ensure the test environment is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the test setup and AWS configuration.
Let me check the test configuration files to understand how AWS credentials are handled.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Empty SQS configuration is correct for local testing
The empty SQS configuration in
.rr-sqs-raw.yamlis intentional and correct. The tests are using a local SQS endpoint (visible from the queue operations intests/jobs_sqs_test.go), and the configuration follows the testing best practices:
- Tests use a local SQS implementation (likely LocalStack) running on port 4566 (as seen in the durability test configuration)
- No hardcoded credentials in test configurations
- Queue operations are properly handled in test helpers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if AWS credentials are properly configured in the test environment # Look for environment variable setup in test files or CI configurations # Check test setup files for AWS credential configuration rg -l "AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY|AWS_REGION" tests/Length of output: 364
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check test files for AWS configuration and setup rg -A 5 "func Test.*SQS" tests/ rg -A 10 "NewClient" tests/Length of output: 11574
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the test configuration files for AWS endpoint configuration rg -A 5 "endpoint|key|secret|region" tests/configs/ cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-raw.yamlLength of output: 511
tests/php_test_files/jobs/jobs_err.php (1)
9-10: LGTM: Header handling looks goodThe attempt count extraction and type casting is implemented correctly.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init.yaml (3)
33-34: LGTM! Consistent configuration across pipelines.Good practice maintaining consistent
prefetchvalues across both pipelines. The specific queue naming also improves clarity.
Line range hint
1-38: Verify compatibility with schema changes and other configurations.Several parameters have been removed from this configuration. Please ensure:
- The changes align with the updated schema validation
- Other test configurations are updated consistently
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistency across test configurations echo "Checking for removed parameters in other config files..." rg -l 'relay:|relay_timeout:|max_jobs:|allocate_timeout:|destroy_timeout:' tests/configs/ # Check schema validation echo "Checking schema definition for removed fields..." rg '"(relay|relay_timeout|max_jobs|allocate_timeout|destroy_timeout)"' -g 'schema.json'
9-9: Verify credential handling for SQS configuration.The empty SQS configuration suggests credentials are being handled externally. Please confirm:
- How are the AWS credentials being provided in the test environment?
- Is this approach consistent with other test configurations?
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is intentional and correct
The git history shows this is part of a deliberate cleanup in test files. The credentials were removed in commit a1a6313 with the message "Fix SQS tests" where:
- The test was modified to use unique queues for each test
- Test files were cleaned up to only use defaults
- The SQS endpoint was previously pointing to a local test endpoint (http://127.0.0.1:9324)
This change is consistent with best practices for test configurations, where credentials should not be hardcoded in test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check other test configurations for SQS credential handling patterns echo "Searching for SQS configurations in test files..." rg -l 'sqs:' tests/configs/Length of output: 409
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for SQS configurations echo "Searching for SQS configurations in yaml files..." fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/ --exec grep -l "sqs:" echo -e "\nChecking content of found SQS configurations..." fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/ --exec grep -A 5 "sqs:" {} \; echo -e "\nLooking for AWS credential patterns..." rg -i "(key|secret|region|endpoint|credential)" tests/configs/Length of output: 486
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the git history of this file to understand the changes echo "Checking git history of the SQS config file..." git log -p tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init.yaml echo -e "\nLooking for test files that might use this config..." rg -l "rr-sqs-init.yaml" tests/ echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable usage in test files..." rg -i "(getenv|env\.|environment|aws)" tests/Length of output: 5854
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-attr.yaml (1)
9-9: Verify AWS credential handling in testsThe empty SQS configuration suggests credentials are expected from environment variables or AWS credential chain. Please ensure the test environment is properly configured to handle this.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to understand how SQS tests are handling credentials and configurations.
I need to verify how the test environment handles AWS credentials and if the empty SQS configuration is intentional and properly supported.
I need to verify the test environment setup and compare with other SQS configuration files to understand if the empty configuration is intentional and properly handled.
I need to understand how the test environment is set up and how SQS credentials are handled across different test configurations.
Based on the evidence gathered from the test files, I can now generate the final response:
Empty SQS configuration is valid as credentials are provided via environment
The empty SQS configuration is intentional and correct. The test environment properly handles AWS credentials through environment variables:
RR_SQS_TEST_KEYandRR_SQS_TEST_SECRETfor authenticationRR_SQS_TEST_REGIONfor region configurationRR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINTfor the service endpointRR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_IDfor account identification🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if test files contain AWS credential setup rg -g "!vendor/*" -g "*.{php,go,yaml}" "AWS_ACCESS_KEY|AWS_SECRET_KEY|AWS_REGION" tests/Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any AWS-related environment setup or credential handling in test files rg -g "!vendor/*" "aws|sqs|credentials" tests/ -A 3 -B 3 # Also check the test configuration files for SQS setup patterns fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 35469
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the test environment setup and configuration files rg -g "!vendor/*" "RR_SQS_TEST" tests/ # Also check the specific SQS test configuration file fd -e yaml -e yml "rr-sqs-attr.yaml" tests/configs/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 1268
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the test setup file for environment variables fd -g "*.go" . tests/ --exec grep -l "RR_SQS_TEST" {} \; -exec cat {} # Also check if there are any other SQS config files to compare with fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ --exec grep -l "sqs:" {} \; -exec cat {}Length of output: 353
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler approach to check SQS configs rg "sqs:" tests/configs/ rg -A 5 -B 5 "RR_SQS_TEST" tests/helpers/ # Also check for any init or setup files fd "init|setup|main" tests/ --type fLength of output: 1656
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init-br.yaml (1)
24-26: LGTM! Configuration changes align with AWS best practices.The changes improve the configuration by:
- Using a reasonable prefetch value
- Enabling long polling via wait_time_seconds
- Using a dedicated test queue name
Let's verify if the queue name is consistently used across test files:
✅ Verification successful
Queue name usage is consistent across test files
The queue name
sqs-init-br-1is consistently used:
- Standard queue name
sqs-init-br-1in.rr-sqs-init-br.yamland cleanup injobs_sqs_test.go- FIFO variant
sqs-init-br-1.fifoin.rr-sqs-init-br_fifo.yamland cleanup injobs_sqs_fifo_test.go🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent queue name usage # Expect: All references to use 'sqs-init-br-1' for test-1 rg "sqs-init-br-1" --type=yaml --type=goLength of output: 382
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-pq.yaml (2)
34-35: Verify SQS message retention requirements.The
MessageRetentionPeriodattribute has been removed. Please confirm that:
- The default SQS message retention period (4 days) is sufficient for your test scenarios
- Test cleanup procedures properly handle message cleanup regardless of retention period
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test files for message cleanup procedures # Look for cleanup or teardown code in test files echo "Checking for test cleanup procedures..." rg -B 5 -A 5 "cleanup|teardown|purge|delete.*message" tests/ # Check for retention period references echo "Checking for retention period configurations..." rg "RetentionPeriod" tests/
10-10: Verify test execution with empty SQS configuration.The SQS configuration has been simplified to an empty object. Please ensure that:
- Required credentials are properly provided through environment variables
- Test suite executes successfully with this minimal configuration
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is valid for tests with LocalStack
The empty SQS configuration is intentional and correct for this test environment:
- The test uses LocalStack (running at
127.0.0.1:4566) as shown indocker-compose-sqs-local.yaml- Required credentials are provided via environment variables (
RR_SQS_TEST_*) as seen in the test helpers- The test configuration properly defines the pipelines with necessary queue settings
- Test cleanup is handled via
DeleteQueueshelper which uses the environment variables🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there are any environment variable references in the test files # that might be used for SQS configuration # Look for AWS credential environment variables in test files echo "Checking for AWS credential environment variables in test files..." rg -l "AWS_ACCESS_KEY|AWS_SECRET_KEY|AWS_REGION|AWS_ENDPOINT" tests/ # Check for environment setup in test files echo "Checking for environment setup in test files..." rg -A 5 "os\.Setenv|getenv" tests/Length of output: 463
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify SQS configuration handling # Check for SQS test files and their setup echo "Checking for SQS test files..." fd "sqs.*test" tests/ # Look for mock/fake SQS configurations in test files echo "Checking for mock/fake SQS configurations..." rg -A 10 "fake.*sqs|mock.*sqs|localstack|elasticmq" tests/ # Check for test configuration loading patterns echo "Checking test configuration loading..." rg -A 5 "LoadConfig|ParseConfig|NewConfig" tests/ # Look specifically for this config file usage echo "Checking .rr-sqs-pq.yaml usage..." rg ".rr-sqs-pq.yaml" tests/Length of output: 1272
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the SQS test setup and configuration handling # Check the content of the SQS test file that uses this config echo "Examining SQS test implementation..." cat tests/jobs_sqs_test.go # Look for LocalStack endpoint configuration echo "Checking LocalStack endpoint configuration..." rg -B 5 -A 5 "localhost:4566|127.0.0.1:4566" tests/ # Check for environment setup in the test files echo "Checking test environment setup..." rg -B 5 -A 10 "func TestSQS|func \(p \*SQS\)" tests/jobs_sqs_test.goLength of output: 30269
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual test configuration file and environment setup # Check the content of the test configuration file echo "Checking test configuration content..." cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-pq.yaml # Look for environment variable setup in test helpers echo "Checking test helpers for environment setup..." fd "helpers.*go" tests/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 7383
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-otel.yaml (2)
33-35: LGTM! Pipeline configuration changes improve testing efficiency.The changes to the pipeline configuration are well-considered:
- Reduced prefetch (10) is more appropriate for testing scenarios
- Increased wait_time_seconds (10) implements SQS long polling, which is more efficient and reduces costs
- Queue name clearly indicates its purpose for OpenTelemetry testing
18-18: Verify the empty SQS configuration.The SQS configuration has been simplified to an empty object. Please confirm that:
- Required AWS credentials are provided through environment variables
- Default values for region and endpoint are appropriate for the test environment
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is valid and expected
The empty SQS configuration
sqs: { }is correct as the actual AWS credentials and configuration are:
- Provided through environment variables (
RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT,RR_SQS_TEST_REGION,RR_SQS_TEST_KEY,RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET) as seen in the test files- Queue-specific settings are defined in the jobs pipeline configurations
- This pattern is consistently used across multiple test configuration files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if AWS credentials are configured in environment files or other config files # Test: Look for AWS credential configuration in test setup files rg -l 'AWS_' tests/Length of output: 19
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for AWS/SQS configuration patterns in test files and main code rg -i "aws|sqs" tests/ -A 5 # Also check for environment variable setup in test files rg "env\." tests/ -A 2 # Look for any mock or fake AWS configurations in test files rg "mock.*aws|fake.*aws" tests/ -A 3Length of output: 38733
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the test configuration files to understand the SQS setup cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-otel.yaml # Also check other SQS config files for comparison cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init.yamlLength of output: 1216
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-read-approximate-count.yaml (4)
24-27: LGTM! SQS configuration values are within acceptable ranges.
prefetch: 10- Reasonable batch size for testingvisibility_timeout: 900- Correctly set to SQS maximumwait_time_seconds: 10- Good value for long-polling
28-29: Verify error visibility timeout behavior.The configuration introduces new features:
retain_failed_jobs: true- Failed jobs will be retainederror_visibility_timeout: 10- Failed jobs will be visible again after 10 secondsPlease ensure this matches the expected behavior for error handling and job retry logic.
Let's verify the PHP script handles these settings correctly:
#!/bin/bash # Check how the PHP script handles failed jobs rg -A 10 'ApproximateReceiveCount' "php_test_files/jobs/jobs_respond_with_count.php"
6-7: Verify PHP script path exists.The server is configured to execute
php_test_files/jobs/jobs_respond_with_count.php. Let's ensure this path is correct.#!/bin/bash # Verify the PHP script exists and contains expected functionality fd -e php "jobs_respond_with_count.php"
9-9: Verify if empty SQS configuration is intentional.The empty SQS configuration section might need additional settings depending on your AWS credentials management strategy.
Run the following to check if AWS credentials are configured elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is valid for this test case
The empty SQS configuration is intentional and valid in this test context. Other test configuration files in the codebase (like
.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yaml) demonstrate that AWS credentials can be configured when needed. This particular test file.rr-sqs-read-approximate-count.yamlappears to be specifically focused on testing the read approximate count functionality without requiring actual AWS credentials.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for AWS credentials configuration in other files rg -g '*.yaml' -g '*.php' 'aws_key|aws_secret|credentials|AWS_'Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AWS configuration patterns in yaml files rg -g '*.yaml' 'aws:|key:|secret:|endpoint:|region:' -A 3 # Also check for test configuration files fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/Length of output: 818
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-auto-ack.yaml (2)
20-37: Verify pipeline naming consistency across test suite.Let's ensure the pipeline names
test-1andtest-2are consistently used across the test suite and don't conflict with other test configurations.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to search for pipeline configurations in the test files.
Let me try one more search strategy to find any YAML files in the test directory, using ripgrep which might be more reliable for this case.
Based on the directory listing, I notice that the file
.rr-sqs-auto-ack.yamlis being reviewed but doesn't exist in the repository yet. This appears to be a new configuration file being added. Let me check the test files to understand the pipeline naming patterns in the existing tests.
Based on the test files analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Pipeline naming follows test conventions and is consistent
The pipeline names
test-1andtest-2in the new.rr-sqs-auto-ack.yamlconfiguration follow the established patterns seen in the test suite, where:
- Test files use simple, descriptive pipeline names
- Multiple pipelines are commonly used in tests (evidenced by logs checking for "2 pipelines must be stopped")
- The associated queue names
sqs-auto-ack-1andsqs-auto-ack-2follow the same naming pattern as other test queues (e.g.,sqs-test-declare-stats,sqs-raw-payload)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pipeline names in test configurations echo "Checking pipeline name usage across test configurations:" rg -A 2 'pipelines:' tests/configs/Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test configuration files and their pipeline definitions echo "Searching for YAML config files:" fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ echo -e "\nChecking content of found config files:" fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ -x cat {}Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all files in tests directory to understand the structure echo "Listing files in tests directory:" ls -R tests/ echo -e "\nSearching for YAML content with ripgrep:" rg -l "pipelines:" tests/Length of output: 734
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check SQS test files for pipeline naming patterns echo "Checking SQS test files for pipeline configurations:" rg -A 5 "pipeline|queue" tests/jobs_sqs_test.go tests/jobs_sqs_fifo_test.go tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.go # Also check docker compose files for any related config echo -e "\nChecking docker-compose files:" cat tests/env/docker-compose-sqs-local.yamlLength of output: 7430
9-14: Verify if empty SQS configuration is intentional.The SQS configuration block is empty. While this might be intentional for testing auto-acknowledgment functionality, please confirm if any default SQS settings should be specified here (like region or endpoint for testing).
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to verify the SQS configuration patterns.
Let me correct the command syntax and try again.
Let me try one final search strategy using ripgrep to find any YAML content.
Empty SQS configuration block is correct for test configuration
After analyzing multiple test configuration files, I can confirm that the empty SQS configuration block
sqs: { }is intentional and consistent across test files. The actual SQS settings (queue, prefetch, etc.) are properly configured within individual job pipelines when needed. Only the durability-redial test case requires specific SQS credentials and endpoint configuration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other SQS configurations in test files for comparison echo "Checking other test configurations for SQS settings:" rg -l 'sqs:' tests/configs/Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SQS configurations in yaml files fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ --exec cat {} \; -X echo "=== {} ==="Length of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SQS configurations in yaml files echo "=== Searching YAML files in tests/configs/ ===" fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ -x cat {}Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any YAML files and their content in the tests directory echo "=== Searching for YAML content in tests directory ===" rg -l --type yaml . tests/ echo "=== Content of found YAML files ===" for f in $(rg -l --type yaml . tests/); do echo "=== $f ===" cat "$f" doneLength of output: 15555
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo.yaml (3)
24-25: Improved SQS configuration for FIFO queuesThe changes reflect best practices:
- Reduced prefetch (10) is more appropriate for FIFO queues where message ordering is crucial
- wait_time_seconds of 10 enables long polling, reducing API calls and costs
9-9: Verify AWS credentials handling in testsThe empty SQS configuration suggests reliance on default AWS credential providers. Ensure that the test environment properly handles credential resolution through environment variables or IAM roles.
#!/bin/bash # Check if AWS credentials are configured in test files rg -A 5 "AWS_ACCESS_KEY|AWS_SECRET_KEY|AWS_REGION" tests/
27-27: Verify FIFO queue naming conventionThe comment correctly enforces the
.fifosuffix requirement for FIFO queues. This is a critical AWS requirement.✅ Verification successful
FIFO queue naming convention correctly enforced
The verification confirms that all FIFO queue configurations in the codebase consistently use the
.fifosuffix, while standard queues correctly omit it. The comment's enforcement of the.fifosuffix requirement is accurate and aligns with AWS's requirements:
- All files containing FIFO queues (with names ending in
.fifo):
.rr-sqs-init_fifo.yaml.rr-sqs-init_fifo_auto_ack.yaml.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml.rr-sqs-init-br_fifo.yaml.rr-sqs-attr.yaml🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all FIFO queue configurations use the .fifo suffix rg -g '*.yaml' 'queue:.*(?<!\.fifo)$' tests/configs/Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check all YAML files in tests/configs for queue configurations rg -g '*.yaml' 'queue:.*\.fifo' tests/configs/ # Also check for any queue configurations without .fifo to get complete context rg -g '*.yaml' 'queue:' tests/configs/Length of output: 2557
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init-br_fifo.yaml (4)
36-37: LGTM! Configuration maintains consistency between pipelines.The changes to test-2 pipeline mirror those in test-1, maintaining a consistent configuration pattern:
- Both use the same prefetch value
- Both follow FIFO queue naming convention
- Both retain message grouping configuration
Line range hint
1-43: Verify handling of removed configuration parameters.The configuration has been significantly simplified by removing several parameters:
- Message retention period
- Visibility timeout
- Delay seconds
- Maximum message size
Please ensure that:
- Default values are appropriate for the use case
- Error handling is still robust without explicit timeout configurations
#!/bin/bash # Search for default values and error handling documentation rg -A 5 "retention|visibility.*timeout|delay.*seconds" "docs/" "*.md" || echo "No documentation found for default configurations"
9-9: Verify AWS credentials handling with empty SQS configuration.The empty SQS configuration suggests that AWS credentials are being handled through environment variables or IAM roles. Please ensure that:
- The test environment has proper credential configuration
- Documentation is updated to reflect the credential requirements
#!/bin/bash # Check if credentials handling is documented rg -l "AWS credentials|AWS_ACCESS_KEY|AWS_SECRET_KEY" "README*" "docs/" || echo "No credential documentation found"
24-27: Review performance impact of configuration changes.Notable changes that could affect performance:
prefetchreduced from 1000 to 10 - This significantly reduces the batch sizewait_time_secondsincreased to 10 - Enables long polling which can reduce costs but increases latencyConsider documenting the rationale for these changes and their expected impact on system behavior.
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo_auto_ack.yaml (3)
26-27: Review message_group_id configuration.Both queues use the same
message_group_id: 'RR'. While this works for testing, in production scenarios:
- Using the same message_group_id across different queues might not be intended
- Consider using distinct message group IDs if messages should be processed independently
Also applies to: 37-38
4-4: Review RPC endpoint security for production use.The RPC endpoint is bound to
127.0.0.1. While this is fine for testing, ensure that:
- Production configurations use appropriate security measures
- Access to the RPC endpoint is properly restricted
7-7: Consider using an absolute path for the PHP test file.Using a relative path
php_test_files/jobs/jobs_ok.phpmight cause issues if tests are executed from different working directories.tests/configs/.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yaml (1)
29-32: Verify the VisibilityTimeout=0 setting.Setting
VisibilityTimeoutto 0 means messages become immediately visible for redelivery after being received. While this might be intentional for testing the ErrorVisibilityTimeout feature:
- It could lead to message redelivery before processing completes
- It might cause test flakiness due to race conditions
✅ Verification successful
VisibilityTimeout=0 setting is intentional for durability testing
The VisibilityTimeout=0 setting is correct in this context as it's part of a durability test that:
- Simulates network failures using toxiproxy
- Tests message processing during connection interruptions
- Verifies message delivery and processing through reconnection cycles
The test implementation shows proper handling:
- Messages are pushed during proxy disable/enable cycles
- Test waits appropriate intervals between state changes
- Success is verified by checking both push and processing logs
- All 4 test messages are confirmed to be processed successfully
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for error handling related to VisibilityTimeout=0 in tests # Expect: Tests should handle immediate message redelivery scenarios # Search for test cases handling VisibilityTimeout rg -A 5 "VisibilityTimeout.*0" tests/Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's broaden the search to understand the test context better # Search for any test files related to SQS durability or redial fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/ --exec grep -l "sqs.*durability.*redial" # Search for test files containing VisibilityTimeout fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/ --exec grep -l "VisibilityTimeout" # Look for test implementation files that might handle the redial scenario rg -l "durability.*redial" tests/Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the test implementation to understand how it handles the durability scenario # Check the test implementation file content cat tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.go # Also search for any test setup or helper functions related to SQS visibility timeout rg -A 10 "VisibilityTimeout" tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.goLength of output: 3108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the test configuration file to understand the complete test setup # Read the test configuration file cat tests/configs/.rr-sqs-durability-redial.yaml # Also look for any related test helper functions that might handle message processing rg -A 10 "PushToPipe" tests/helpers/Length of output: 2481
tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml (3)
18-18: Confirm intended reduction in worker count.The number of workers has been reduced from 10 to 1, which could impact processing throughput. While this might be intentional for testing, please verify that this aligns with the test requirements.
25-31: Review potential race conditions with visibility timeout.The configuration shows:
- Increased prefetch (10)
- Short visibility timeout (10s)
- Comment indicates intentional early job release
This combination could lead to race conditions where:
- Multiple jobs are prefetched
- Jobs become visible again before processing completes
- Same jobs might be processed multiple times
Consider if this is the intended behavior for your test cases.
9-9: Verify the empty SQS configuration.The SQS configuration has been simplified to an empty object. Please confirm:
- Are credentials and endpoint configurations expected from environment variables?
- Is this simplified configuration sufficient for the test scenarios?
✅ Verification successful
Empty SQS configuration is acceptable in test configuration
The empty SQS configuration
sqs: { }in a test configuration file is a valid test scenario. Since this is specifically a test configuration file (located intests/configs/), it's reasonable to have minimal configurations to test different scenarios, including how the system handles default values. Our attempts to find other configuration patterns or documentation didn't yield results, suggesting this might be an intentional test case for default behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if other test configs also use empty SQS configuration echo "Checking other test configurations for SQS settings..." rg -l "sqs:\s*\{\s*\}" "tests/configs/"Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any SQS configurations in test files to understand the pattern echo "Checking all SQS configurations in test files..." rg -A 5 "sqs:" "tests/configs/" # Also check for environment variable usage in test files echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable references..." rg -i "env|environment" "tests/configs/"Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find all YAML files in tests/configs and examine their content echo "Examining all YAML files in tests/configs..." fd -e yaml -e yml . tests/configs/ --exec cat {} # Also check if there are any documentation files that might explain the configuration echo -e "\nChecking for documentation files..." fd -e md . . --exec grep -l -i "sqs" {} \;Length of output: 284
tests/jobs_sqs_durability_test.go (1)
126-127: LGTM! Improved assertion messages.The added error messages make the test's expectations clearer and will help with debugging test failures.
.github/workflows/linux_durability.yml (2)
3-9: LGTM! Good security practice to restrict workflow triggers.The explicit branch filtering for both push and pull_request events helps prevent unnecessary workflow runs and aligns with security best practices.
16-18: LGTM! Excellent resource optimization with concurrency controls.The concurrency configuration with cancel-in-progress is particularly valuable for these durability tests, which have a 60-minute timeout. This prevents queue buildup of redundant test runs and optimizes CI resources.
.github/workflows/linux.yml (3)
3-9: LGTM: Branch targeting configuration is secure.The explicit branch targeting for 'master' is a good security practice, preventing the workflow from running on arbitrary branches.
15-17: LGTM: Efficient concurrency management.The concurrency settings with cancellation policy will help prevent resource wastage by ensuring only the latest workflow run is active. This is particularly important for SQS tests that might involve AWS resources.
72-72: Verify AWS account ID usage in tests.The addition of
RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_IDsuggests new AWS account-specific testing. This aligns with the PR's focus on ErrorVisibilityTimeout support.Let's verify how this account ID is used in the tests:
✅ Verification successful
AWS account ID is properly used in SQS test configurations
The environment variable
RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_IDis correctly used in test files to construct SQS queue URLs in the formatendpoint/account-id/queue-name. This is the standard AWS SQS URL format and its usage is consistent with AWS best practices for testing SQS integrations.
- Used in
tests/jobs_sqs_test.gofor queue URL validation- Used in
tests/helpers/helpers.gofor SQS client configuration🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the new account ID environment variable rg -l "RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" tests/Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID is used in the test files rg "RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" tests/ -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 1059
tests/go.mod (1)
110-110: LGTM! Verify dependency resolution.The update to
go.temporal.io/sdkto a specific pre-release version appears intentional and aligns with the PR coordination requirements.Let's verify there are no dependency conflicts:
✅ Verification successful
Dependency update verified and consistent
The verification shows:
- The temporal SDK version is consistently referenced in both
go.modandgo.sum- No conflicting versions or replace directives are present
- Only one
go.modfile references this dependency- Related dependencies (api, opentelemetry contrib) are properly aligned
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any dependency conflicts or resolution issues # Expected: No errors in dependency resolution # Test 1: Verify module requirements are consistent go mod verify # Test 2: Check for dependency conflicts go mod graph | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | grep 'go.temporal.io/sdk'Length of output: 243
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to analyze the dependencies # 1. Check the content of go.mod for all temporal SDK references rg "go.temporal.io/sdk" -A 2 -B 2 # 2. Look for any replace directives that might affect this dependency rg "^replace.*temporal" # 3. Check if there are any other go.mod files that might have conflicting versions fd "go.mod$" --exec grep -l "go.temporal.io/sdk" {}Length of output: 1956
tests/helpers/helpers.go (2)
5-19: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and necessary.All new imports are properly utilized in the new DeleteQueues function.
36-65:⚠️ Potential issueSeveral improvements needed for robustness.
While the function works, there are a few areas that could be improved:
- Error handling should use
require.NoErrorinstead ofassert.NoErroron line 63 to prevent continuing after a failure- Missing validation for required environment variables
- Magic numbers should be constants
- Queue URL construction could be more flexible
Here's a suggested improvement:
+const ( + queueDeletionTimeout = time.Minute + maxRetryAttempts = 2 +) func DeleteQueues(t *testing.T, queueNames ...string) { + // Validate required environment variables + requiredEnvVars := []string{ + "RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT", + "RR_SQS_TEST_REGION", + "RR_SQS_TEST_KEY", + "RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET", + "RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID", + } + for _, env := range requiredEnvVars { + require.NotEmpty(t, os.Getenv(env), "Missing required environment variable: "+env) + } + // should not be more than 1 minute - ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Minute) + ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), queueDeletionTimeout) defer cancel() awsConf, err := sqsConf.LoadDefaultConfig(ctx, sqsConf.WithBaseEndpoint(os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT")), sqsConf.WithRegion(os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_REGION")), sqsConf.WithCredentialsProvider(credentials.NewStaticCredentialsProvider(os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_KEY"), os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET"), ""))) require.NoError(t, err) client := sqs.NewFromConfig(awsConf, func(o *sqs.Options) { o.Retryer = retry.NewStandard(func(so *retry.StandardOptions) { - so.MaxAttempts = 2 + so.MaxAttempts = maxRetryAttempts }) }) for _, queueName := range queueNames { _, err := client.DeleteQueue(ctx, &sqs.DeleteQueueInput{ QueueUrl: aws.String(fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s/%s", os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT"), os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID"), queueName), ), }) - assert.NoError(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) } }Let's verify the environment variables are set in the test configuration:
tests/jobs_sqs_fifo_test.go (5)
113-115: Great addition of cleanup handler!The cleanup ensures proper resource management by removing test queues after test completion, preventing resource leaks and test interference.
124-124: LGTM: Config path accurately reflects test purposeThe configuration path now clearly indicates its auto-acknowledgment functionality, improving test clarity.
196-198: LGTM: Consistent cleanup implementationThe cleanup follows the established pattern and uses descriptive queue names that reflect their auto-ack functionality.
536-542: LGTM: Well-documented assertions with accurate countsThe assertions are clear, well-documented, and correctly reflect the expected behavior with the increased number of iterations.
544-546: LGTM: Proper cleanup implementationThe cleanup follows the established pattern and uses descriptive queue names that reflect the prefetch functionality.
schema.json (1)
210-210: LGTM! Documentation updates improve clarity.The updated descriptions for AWS credentials now correctly emphasize environment variable support, making it clearer how credentials can be provided.
Also applies to: 218-218
sqsjobs/driver.go (3)
61-67: LGTM: New fields align with PR objectivesThe new fields
errorVisibilityTimeout,prefetch, andretainFailedJobsare well-structured and appropriately typed for their intended purposes.
214-218: Review security implications and default valuesA few concerns:
- Multiple
goseclint suppressions might indicate security considerations that need review- Default value of 0 for
errorVisibilityTimeoutmight not be ideal as it effectively makes the message immediately visible again after an errorLet's check for similar patterns in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other gosec suppressions and timeout defaults echo "Checking gosec suppressions:" rg "//nolint:gosec.*int" --type go echo "Checking visibility timeout defaults:" rg "visibility.*timeout.*default" --type goConsider:
- Document why these
gosecwarnings are safe to ignore- Use a more appropriate default for
errorVisibilityTimeout, perhaps matchingvisibilityTimeoutor a minimum safe value
119-134: Add validation for errorVisibilityTimeoutWhile the initialization looks correct, consider adding validation for
errorVisibilityTimeout. Similar to how regular message delays are limited to 900 seconds (15 minutes) in thePushmethod, the error visibility timeout might need similar bounds checking.Let's check if there are any AWS SQS limits for visibility timeout:
Consider adding validation like:
jb := &Driver{ // ... other fields ... errorVisibilityTimeout: conf.ErrorVisibilityTimeout, + // AWS SQS has a maximum visibility timeout of 12 hours (43200 seconds) + if conf.ErrorVisibilityTimeout > 43200 { + return nil, errors.E(op, errors.Errorf("error visibility timeout exceeds maximum allowed value of 43200 seconds (12 hours)")) + } // ... other fields ... }tests/jobs_sqs_test.go (4)
122-124: LGTM: Consistent cleanup implementation across test functions.The cleanup functions are well-placed at the beginning of each test function and properly handle queue deletion, ensuring test isolation and preventing resource leaks.
Also applies to: 213-215, 226-228, 378-380, 391-393, 475-477, 559-561, 643-645, 737-739, 847-849, 959-961
223-223: LGTM: Enhanced test coverage with additional push operations.The test configuration is now more specific to auto-acknowledgment testing, and the increased number of push operations provides better coverage of the auto-ack functionality.
Also applies to: 290-294
635-726: LGTM: Well-structured test for approximate receive count functionality.The test properly verifies SQS message receive count behavior with appropriate wait times and assertions. The implementation follows established patterns and includes proper cleanup.
301-301: LGTM: Comprehensive state verification in assertions.The assertions properly verify all aspects of the job state, including pipeline name, driver type, and queue URL format. The updated assertion count in TestSQSAutoAck (line 301) correctly reflects the increased number of operations.
Also applies to: 818-820, 829-831
sqsjobs/item.go (4)
136-136: Ensure consistent use of error packagesThe use of
errors.Str(pipelineStoppedError)relies on theerrorspackage fromgithub.1485827954.workers.dev/roadrunner-server/errors. Confirm that this is intentional and that there is no confusion with the standarderrorspackage aliased asstderr.
158-168: RefactoringNackmethods improves maintainabilityGood job refactoring the
NackandNackWithOptionsmethods to use the commoncommonNackfunction. This enhances code reuse and simplifies future modifications.
180-215: Verify the message handling logic incommonNackThe switch case in
commonNackhandles message requeueing, deletion, and visibility timeout adjustments based onRetainFailedJobsandErrorVisibilityTimeout. Ensure that this logic aligns with the intended behavior, particularly when both options are enabled.
366-372: Confirm correct assignment of new option fieldsThe fields
ErrorVisibilityTimeoutandRetainFailedJobsare added to theOptionsstruct in theunpackmethod. Verify that these fields are accurately populated from the configuration to prevent unintended behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
go.mod (1)
Line range hint 3-5: Invalid Go version specified
The Go version 1.23 specified in the module file is not valid. The latest stable version of Go is 1.22.
Apply this diff to fix the Go version:
-go 1.23
+go 1.22
-toolchain go1.23.2
+toolchain go1.22.0📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- tests/go.mod (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
go.mod (1)
8-11: AWS SDK version updates look good
The AWS SDK package updates are consistent across all related packages, maintaining version compatibility with minor patch updates. This includes both direct and indirect dependencies.
Also applies to: 27-35
tests/go.mod (3)
9-12: LGTM: AWS SDK version updates are consistent.
The AWS SDK dependencies have been updated to their latest patch versions, maintaining compatibility while incorporating bug fixes and improvements.
34-42: LGTM: Indirect AWS SDK dependencies are properly aligned.
The indirect AWS SDK dependencies have been updated to maintain version compatibility with the direct dependencies.
110-110: Verify the stability of the Temporal SDK pseudo-version.
The update to a pseudo-version (v1.29.2-0.20241025174857-2bd372c351b2) suggests use of an unreleased version. While this might be necessary for specific features or fixes, it's important to ensure stability.
✅ Verification successful
The Temporal SDK update appears to be part of a coordinated dependency update
The pseudo-version v1.29.2-0.20241025174857-2bd372c351b2 was introduced in a commit that also updates the Temporal API from v1.39.0 to v1.40.0, suggesting this is a coordinated update of Temporal dependencies. The change was made with a clear commit message "chore: update temporal deps" and appears to be an intentional upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this pseudo-version is referenced in other parts of the codebase or documentation
# to understand its necessity and potential impact.
# Test: Search for any references to this specific version or related Temporal SDK discussions
rg -i "v1.29.2-0.20241025174857-2bd372c351b2|temporal.*sdk.*version"
# Test: Check for any Temporal SDK version constraints or discussions in documentation
fd -t f -e md -e txt . -x rg -i "temporal.*sdk.*version"
Length of output: 455
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any changes or discussions related to Temporal SDK in recent commits and pull requests
git log -p --grep="temporal" --grep="sdk" -i
# Check for any dependency changes or discussions in pull request description and comments
gh pr view --json title,body,comments
# Look for any usage of Temporal SDK features that might require this specific version
rg -l "temporal.io/sdk" | xargs rg -B2 -A2 "temporal"
# Check go.mod history for previous Temporal SDK versions
git log -p tests/go.mod
Length of output: 66112
remove duplicate prefetch constant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sqsjobs/config.go (1)
182-190: Consider enhancing the test mode error message.
While the security check is good, the error message could be more helpful by specifying which environment variables are missing.
Consider this improvement:
- panic("security check: test mode is enabled, but not all sqs environment parameters are set")
+ missingVars := []string{}
+ if os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_REGION") == "" {
+ missingVars = append(missingVars, "RR_SQS_TEST_REGION")
+ }
+ if os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_KEY") == "" {
+ missingVars = append(missingVars, "RR_SQS_TEST_KEY")
+ }
+ if os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET") == "" {
+ missingVars = append(missingVars, "RR_SQS_TEST_SECRET")
+ }
+ if os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT") == "" {
+ missingVars = append(missingVars, "RR_SQS_TEST_ENDPOINT")
+ }
+ if os.Getenv("RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID") == "" {
+ missingVars = append(missingVars, "RR_SQS_TEST_ACCOUNT_ID")
+ }
+ panic(fmt.Sprintf("security check: test mode is enabled, but the following environment variables are missing: %s", strings.Join(missingVars, ", ")))📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- sqsjobs/config.go (4 hunks)
- sqsjobs/driver.go (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
sqsjobs/config.go (3)
10-21: LGTM! Constants are well-defined and aligned with AWS SQS limits.
The constants are properly organized and the maximum values align with AWS SQS service limits (e.g., maxVisibilityTimeout of 43200 seconds = 12 hours).
136-160: LGTM! Initialization logic properly handles boundaries and AWS defaults.
The initialization logic:
- Sets Prefetch default to 1, aligning with AWS SQS default MaxNumberOfMessages
- Properly enforces AWS SQS limits for visibility timeouts
- Handles invalid values gracefully by setting them to valid defaults
42-54: Verify AWS IAM permissions for ErrorVisibilityTimeout feature.
The implementation and documentation look good. The ErrorVisibilityTimeout feature requires the sqs:ChangeMessageVisibility permission.
Let's verify the IAM permissions documentation:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to find any relevant documentation or code related to AWS permissions and SQS configuration. This will help us verify if the IAM permissions are properly documented anywhere in the codebase.
AWS IAM permission sqs:ChangeMessageVisibility is correctly documented
The codebase correctly documents the required sqs:ChangeMessageVisibility permission in both:
- The struct field documentation in
sqsjobs/config.go - The actual implementation in
sqsjobs/item.gowhich uses theChangeMessageVisibilityAPI
The documentation aligns with the implementation, and the permission requirement is clearly stated in the configuration comments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for IAM-related documentation in README and other docs
rg -i "sqs:ChangeMessageVisibility|IAM permission" --type md
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any documentation about AWS permissions or SQS configuration
rg -i "aws|sqs|permission" --type md
# Also search for any IAM-related code or configuration
rg -i "iam|permission|changeMessageVisibility" --type go
Length of output: 1255
sqsjobs/driver.go (3)
61-67: LGTM: New fields properly added to Driver struct
The new fields errorVisibilityTimeout, prefetch, and retainFailedJobs are well-structured and follow Go naming conventions. They align with the PR objectives of adding support for error visibility timeout and job retention.
214-218: Review security implications of integer conversions
Multiple //nolint:gosec comments are used to suppress security warnings for integer conversions. Consider:
- Adding validation for the numeric values
- Documenting why these conversions are safe
- Using explicit conversion functions that include bounds checking
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing validation of these numeric values
rg -A 5 "pipe\.Int.*validation|InitDefault.*validation"
# Look for any documentation about these security suppressions
rg "gosec.*integer|conversion.*security"119-134: Verify msgInFlightLimit initialization
While the new fields are properly initialized, the msgInFlightLimit initialization needs verification:
- Consider adding validation for the prefetch value before using it as msgInFlightLimit
- The comment "new in 2.12.1" suggests version-specific behavior, but there's no version check
✅ Verification successful
Prefetch validation is properly implemented
The initialization of msgInFlightLimit using conf.Prefetch is safe because:
- The
Config.InitDefault()method enforces valid bounds (1 to 10) for the Prefetch value - If Prefetch is <= 0, it's set to 1
- If Prefetch is > 10, it's set to 10
The version-specific comment "new in 2.12.1" is just documentation of when the feature was added and doesn't require runtime version checks since it's a backward-compatible addition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any version checks or validations for prefetch value
rg -A 5 "msgInFlightLimit|prefetch.*validation"
# Check if there are any compatibility checks for version 2.12.1
rg "2\.12\.1.*compatibility"
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the struct definition and any validation logic
rg -A 10 "type.*Driver.*struct"
# Check for any prefetch validation in config
rg -A 5 "Prefetch.*int"
# Look for any validation methods
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(conf $_Config) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 833
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any initialization or validation logic in config
rg -A 10 "func.*InitDefault|func.*Validate" sqsjobs/
# Look for any prefetch-related validation or constraints
rg -B 2 -A 2 "prefetch|Prefetch" sqsjobs/
# Check for any error handling related to prefetch
ast-grep --pattern 'if $_ := conf.Prefetch; $$ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3702
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sqsjobs/driver.go (1)
119-134: Consider documenting the hardcoded msgInFlightLimit value.While the initialization of the new fields looks good, the hardcoded value of 100 for
msgInFlightLimitwould benefit from a comment explaining its significance or why this specific value was chosen.// new in 2.12.1 +// msgInFlightLimit: Maximum number of messages that can be processed concurrently msgInFlightLimit: ptr(int32(100)),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumtests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
go.mod(2 hunks)sqsjobs/driver.go(4 hunks)sqsjobs/item.go(7 hunks)sqsjobs/listener.go(2 hunks)tests/go.mod(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- go.mod
- sqsjobs/listener.go
- tests/go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (8)
sqsjobs/item.go (5)
30-30: LGTM: Well-documented new fields and constants
The new fields ErrorVisibilityTimeout and RetainFailedJobs are clearly documented and appropriately typed. The constant pipelineStoppedError provides a clear error message.
Also applies to: 64-68
219-234: LGTM: Clean implementation of Nack methods
The Nack and NackWithOptions methods are well-implemented:
- Consistent pipeline state checking
- Good reuse of common logic through
commonNack - Clear parameter passing
250-252: LGTM: Safe header initialization
Good defensive programming practice to initialize the headers map before copying, preventing potential nil pointer dereference.
375-381: Verify initialization of new fields across the codebase
The initialization of new fields looks correct, but we should verify that errorVisibilityTimeout and retainFailedJobs are properly initialized in all relevant places.
Let's verify the initialization:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for initialization of the new fields
ast-grep --pattern 'Options {
$$$
ErrorVisibilityTimeout: $_,
RetainFailedJobs: $_,
$$$
}'158-213: Consider enhancing error handling and logging
The commonNack implementation handles different scenarios well, but could benefit from additional error handling and logging:
- The requeue operation at line 182 should be logged for debugging purposes
- The message deletion operation should be retried in case of transient errors
Let's verify the error handling patterns in the codebase:
sqsjobs/driver.go (3)
61-67: LGTM! New fields align with PR objectives.
The new fields errorVisibilityTimeout, prefetch, and retainFailedJobs are well-placed and properly typed for their intended purposes.
319-319: LGTM! Clear documentation of channel behavior.
The added comment effectively explains the expected behavior of the listener signal and channel closure.
214-218: Consider validating timeout and prefetch values.
The default values of 0 for visibilityTimeout, errorVisibilityTimeout, waitTime, and prefetch might need validation to ensure they meet AWS SQS requirements.
Consider adding validation in the InitDefault method:
// In Config.InitDefault()
if c.VisibilityTimeout < 0 {
c.VisibilityTimeout = defaultVisibilityTimeout
}
if c.ErrorVisibilityTimeout < 0 {
c.ErrorVisibilityTimeout = defaultErrorVisibilityTimeout
}
if c.Prefetch < 0 {
c.Prefetch = defaultPrefetch
}Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valery Piashchynski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
sqsjobs/config.go (2)
36-59: Documentation is comprehensive, but could benefit from a small clarification.The field documentation is excellent, particularly for the ErrorVisibilityTimeout feature. However, consider adding a note about the relationship between MaxMsgInFlightLimit and Prefetch in the documentation.
Add this clarification to the MaxMsgInFlightLimit documentation:
- // The maximum number of messages which can be in-flight at once. Use this to prevent workers from overloading. - // Defaults to prefetch + // The maximum number of messages which can be in-flight at once. Use this to prevent workers from overloading. + // Defaults to prefetch value. Must be greater than or equal to prefetch to ensure optimal message processing.
147-149: Add upper bound validation for MaxMsgInFlightLimit.While the MaxMsgInFlightLimit is initialized to match Prefetch, it lacks an upper bound validation. Consider adding a reasonable upper limit to prevent potential resource exhaustion.
if c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit == 0 { c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit = c.Prefetch +} else if c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit < c.Prefetch { + c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit = c.Prefetch +} else if c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit > 100 { // or another reasonable limit + c.MaxMsgInFlightLimit = 100 }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
sqsjobs/config.go(4 hunks)sqsjobs/driver.go(4 hunks)tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- sqsjobs/driver.go
- tests/configs/.rr-sqs-init_fifo-prefetch.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
sqsjobs/config.go (2)
10-22: LGTM! Constants are well-defined and aligned with AWS SQS limitations.
The constants are properly organized and the previous issue with duplicate 'prefetch' constants has been resolved.
191-199: LGTM! Robust security check for test environment.
The implementation ensures all required test environment variables are present before proceeding, preventing incomplete test configurations from silently failing.
|
Would recommend you rename the max in flight prop. You should not call it both "max" and "limit" - it means the same thing. Would recommend just |
|
Yeah, agree 👍 |
Reason for This PR
Replacement PR for #571.
License Acceptance
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the MIT license.
PR Checklist
[Author TODO: Meet these criteria.][Reviewer TODO: Verify that these criteria are met. Request changes if not]git commit -s).CHANGELOG.md.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores