-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
Add velocity feedback option for diff_drive_controller #260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 10 commits
bc62802
81f35b0
3a14e7b
cdec993
8a005bb
93c77b7
2248fe3
02ce596
1a442fe
4f79852
1fdb105
dc58149
352ec3a
d31115a
a45fd43
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | ||
diff_drive_controller: | ||
test_diff_drive_controller: | ||
ros__parameters: | ||
left_wheel_names: ["left_wheels"] | ||
right_wheel_names: ["right_wheels"] | ||
|
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ diff_drive_controller: | |
pose_covariance_diagonal: [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] | ||
twist_covariance_diagonal: [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] | ||
|
||
position_feedback: false | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. is there other option missing: There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, in my previous comments I also observed that this file is not being loaded correctly by the tests. So I just added the line as an example of configuration and reference, but it is not being used by tests. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Long story short, we need to address this ticket: #48 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was not meaning to block this PR with that comment, just cross referencing |
||
open_loop: true | ||
enable_odom_tf: true | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably also rename this in the follow-up PR to make the variable name clearer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean choosing a different name than "feedback"? Suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's ok for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am actually proposing to rename the "velocity" to "command" or something like this.