Prepare man pages for switch to dnf5 as the default package manager

[jan-kolarik]

For: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216850.

Requires:

• Prepare man pages for switch to dnf5 as the default package manager dnf5#1366
• Prepare man pages for switch to dnf5 as the default package manager dnf-plugins-core#529

Related:

• Deployment issues to resolve when switching the DNF5 as the default package manager dnf5#1057

Closes:

• Rename dnf command in man pages to dnf4 #1965

[inknos]

thinking out loud. what will happen with https://dnf.readthedocs.io and dnf5?

[jan-kolarik]

thinking out loud. what will happen with https://dnf.readthedocs.io and dnf5?

Only man pages output should be affected or?

[inknos]

The PR does not affect readthedocs directly. we are now changing what dnf means, though, before dnf was referring to dnf<5 now it's dnf5.

I was just saying, we have readthedocs which is generated by the same sources. so, should we keep dnf->dnf4 or switch to dnf->dnf5?

it is tricky since the online docs are probably referenced somewhere.

[jan-kolarik]

The PR does not affect readthedocs directly. we are now changing what dnf means, though, before dnf was referring to dnf<5 now it's dnf5.

I was just saying, we have readthedocs which is generated by the same sources. so, should we keep dnf->dnf4 or switch to dnf->dnf5?

it is tricky since the online docs are probably referenced somewhere.

I'd keep dnf.readthedocs.io for dnf4. If it's feasible and straightforward, we could consider adding a mention and link to the new dnf5 pages, e.g. on the title page. What do you think?

[inknos]

ok lgtm then. I added an issue to remember about readthedocs