Merged
Conversation
Not only `.ry` sources, generated `.rb` files seem duplicate and unnecessary.
st0012
reviewed
Jan 1, 2025
.rdoc_options
Outdated
| @@ -1,8 +1,4 @@ | |||
| exclude: | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given that it now has no values, maybe the key can be removed too?
nobu
force-pushed
the
doc-racc-generated
branch
from
faaf5b8 to
69132ca
Compare
matzbot
pushed a commit
to ruby/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2025
(ruby/rdoc#1265) * [DOC] Ignore racc-generated files Not only `.ry` sources, generated `.rb` files seem duplicate and unnecessary. * [DOC] Select files by .document files for syncing ruby/rdoc@fb7041ec98
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not only
.rysources, generated.rbfiles seem duplicate and unnecessary.