Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add blog post for 1.71 #1118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add blog post for 1.71 #1118
Changes from all commits
9e67c03
05d7e86
67f127b
cb3fa09
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I'm late to this, but I think people are finding this confusing due to the unclear distinction between types of libraries. You've never needed to install the
.dll
(dynamic library) in order to link to it. In fact having it is no help at all. You did need a.lib
(a static library) that describes which symbol is imported from which dll. This is usually called an "import library". But now you don't need it becauseraw-dylib
.Admittedly I don't have better wording right now but I thought I should bring it up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisDenton With hindsight, it might have been clearer to say "This avoids requiring developers to install those libraries", rather than "users".
It might also have made sense to spell out more details about import libraries, rather than glossing over the distinction.