Skip to content

Minor, more explicit names #3424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2016
Merged

Minor, more explicit names #3424

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2016

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Dec 18, 2016

Ultraminor renaming. Have to look at this tests because it fails if you link with older libgit.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 18, 2016

📌 Commit 8370aae has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 18, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 8370aae with merge 2736f00...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 18, 2016

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 8370aae with merge d55dbc4...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2016
Minor, more explicit names

Ultraminor renaming. Have to look at this tests because it fails if you link with older libgit.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 19, 2016

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing d55dbc4 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 8370aae into rust-lang:master Dec 19, 2016
@matklad matklad deleted the naming-things branch January 18, 2017 10:19
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.15.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants