Skip to content

Outdated MIPS toolchain #100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
polachok opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #114
Closed

Outdated MIPS toolchain #100

polachok opened this issue Dec 15, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #114

Comments

@polachok
Copy link
Contributor

I think we waste too much time on workarounds for its problems. It was built when debian squeezy was all the rage (almost 5 years ago). Let's just drop it and use something more modern.

Linux-mips website has a list of toolchains we can use.
I created a branch using CodeScape MIPS SDK. It currently fails on linking stage, but I thought it would be a good idea to ask of your opinion before researching it further.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Yeah I'd be totally down for using a newer toolchain, I definitely agree the one we're using is quite old! It was basically just the first one that I ran across :)

@richard-uk1
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to be the easiest way?

https://wiki.debian.org/CrossToolchains

@polachok
Copy link
Contributor Author

polachok commented Jan 2, 2016

See #114

danielverkamp pushed a commit to danielverkamp/libc that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2020
* Add _mm_set_ss

* Add _mm_set1_ps and _mm_set_ps1

* Add _mm_set_ps

* Add _mm_setr_ps

* Add _mm_setzero_ps

* Fix _mm_setr_ps instr test on x86

* Sidestep black_box ABI issue on i586
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants