You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
libc currently provides a number of convenient integer type aliases. However, the least and fast integer types (e.g. int_fast16_t, etc.) aren't currently included. Is there a reason for their exclusion, or is this just awaiting an implementation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After some research in apple's libc, musl and glibc, I found that [u]int_least(n)_t == [u]int(n)_t. For [u]int_fast(n)_t, however, it's more complicated:
In #1838 it was noticed that the "least" aliases resolve exactly to our types, so they were omitted for the same reason that the fixed-width aliases were deprecated.
libc currently provides a number of convenient integer type aliases. However,
theandleast
fast
integer types (e.g.int_fast16_t
, etc.) aren't currently included. Is there a reason for their exclusion, or is this just awaiting an implementation?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: