Skip to content

docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with ignore #1923

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

santoshxshrestha
Copy link
Contributor

The example demonstrating 'static lifetime usage is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block annotation from editable to ignore to better reflect its purpose and avoid confusion.

The example demonstrating `'static` lifetime usage is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block annotation from `editable` to `ignore` to better reflect its purpose and avoid confusion.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 22, 2025

r? @marioidival

rustbot has assigned @marioidival.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@marioidival marioidival merged commit fbbf20a into rust-lang:master Apr 22, 2025
1 check passed
@santoshxshrestha santoshxshrestha deleted the patch-1 branch April 23, 2025 11:51
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#140676 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss

Update books

## rust-lang/reference

9 commits in 3bf3402aea982b876eb56c87da17b0685c6461d5..387392674d74656f7cb437c05a96f0c52ea8e601
2025-05-03 21:29:09 UTC to 2025-04-22 15:25:03 UTC

- Document `let_chains` again (rust-lang/reference#1740)
- Add: orphan rule rationale. (rust-lang/reference#1755)
- Remove apologies about the Reference (rust-lang/reference#1792)
- Clean up some inline assembly examples (rust-lang/reference#1804)
- Remove StructExprTuple and StructExprUnit (rust-lang/reference#1803)
- Improve documentation of struct expressions (rust-lang/reference#1799)
- Clarify interaction of asm-goto with IBT (rust-lang/reference#1790)
- naked functions (rust-lang/reference#1689)
- Relabel grammarRailroad-Button (rust-lang/reference#1798)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88..8a8918c698534547fa8a1a693cb3e7277f0bfb2f
2025-04-30 12:20:49 UTC to 2025-04-22 17:42:30 UTC

-   The example is not meant to be compiled. Changed the code block ann… (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1926)
- Non-tail recursive call note in testcase_linked_list.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1924)
- docs: mark illustrative 'static lifetime example with `ignore` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1923)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants