Skip to content

Rustup #10473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Mar 10, 2023
Merged

Rustup #10473

merged 21 commits into from
Mar 10, 2023

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @ghost

changelog: none

nnethercote and others added 18 commits February 24, 2023 07:32
(This is a large commit. The changes to
`compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/context.rs` are the most important ones.)

The current naming scheme is a mess, with a mix of `_intern_`, `intern_`
and `mk_` prefixes, with little consistency. In particular, in many
cases it's easy to use an iterator interner when a (preferable) slice
interner is available.

The guiding principles of the new naming system:
- No `_intern_` prefixes.
- The `intern_` prefix is for internal operations.
- The `mk_` prefix is for external operations.
- For cases where there is a slice interner and an iterator interner,
  the former is `mk_foo` and the latter is `mk_foo_from_iter`.

Also, `slice_interners!` and `direct_interners!` can now be `pub` or
non-`pub`, which helps enforce the internal/external operations
division.

It's not perfect, but I think it's a clear improvement.

The following lists show everything that was renamed.

slice_interners
- const_list
  - mk_const_list -> mk_const_list_from_iter
  - intern_const_list -> mk_const_list
- substs
  - mk_substs -> mk_substs_from_iter
  - intern_substs -> mk_substs
  - check_substs -> check_and_mk_substs (this is a weird one)
- canonical_var_infos
  - intern_canonical_var_infos -> mk_canonical_var_infos
- poly_existential_predicates
  - mk_poly_existential_predicates -> mk_poly_existential_predicates_from_iter
  - intern_poly_existential_predicates -> mk_poly_existential_predicates
  - _intern_poly_existential_predicates -> intern_poly_existential_predicates
- predicates
  - mk_predicates -> mk_predicates_from_iter
  - intern_predicates -> mk_predicates
  - _intern_predicates -> intern_predicates
- projs
  - intern_projs -> mk_projs
- place_elems
  - mk_place_elems -> mk_place_elems_from_iter
  - intern_place_elems -> mk_place_elems
- bound_variable_kinds
  - mk_bound_variable_kinds -> mk_bound_variable_kinds_from_iter
  - intern_bound_variable_kinds -> mk_bound_variable_kinds

direct_interners
- region
  - intern_region (unchanged)
- const
  - mk_const_internal -> intern_const
- const_allocation
  - intern_const_alloc -> mk_const_alloc
- layout
  - intern_layout -> mk_layout
- adt_def
  - intern_adt_def -> mk_adt_def_from_data (unusual case, hard to avoid)
  - alloc_adt_def(!) -> mk_adt_def
- external_constraints
  - intern_external_constraints -> mk_external_constraints

Other
- type_list
  - mk_type_list -> mk_type_list_from_iter
  - intern_type_list -> mk_type_list
- tup
  - mk_tup -> mk_tup_from_iter
  - intern_tup -> mk_tup
It was probably a leftover from the old `?` desugaring but anyways, it's
unused now except for clippy, which can just use a diagnostics item.
…LangItemFromFn˃˃˃꞉꞉from, r=cjgillot

Remove `from` lang item

It was probably a leftover from the old `?` desugaring but anyways, it's unused now except for clippy, which can just use a diagnostics item.
Update Clippy

Seems like `@flip1995` so this is a couple days late.

r? `@Manishearth`
…rors

Restrict `#[rustc_box]` to `Box::new` calls

Currently, `#[rustc_box]` can be applied to any call expression with a single argument. This PR only allows it to be applied to calls to `Box::new`
This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
rustc_middle: Remove trait `DefIdTree`

This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
PR 107844 made DropAndReplace unused, let's remove it completely
from the codebase.
…eholk

Do not implement HashStable for HashSet (MCP 533)

This PR removes all occurrences of `HashSet` in query results, replacing it either with `FxIndexSet` or with `UnordSet`, and then removes the `HashStable` implementation of `HashSet`. This is part of implementing [MCP 533](rust-lang/compiler-team#533), that is, removing the `HashStable` implementations of all collection types with unstable iteration order.

The changes are mostly mechanical. The only place where additional sorting is happening is in Miri's override implementation of the `exported_symbols` query.
Remove DropAndReplace terminator

#107844 made DropAndReplace unused, let's remove it completely from the codebase.
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #108754 (Retry `pred_known_to_hold_modulo_regions` with fulfillment if ambiguous)
 - #108759 (1.41.1 supported 32-bit Apple targets)
 - #108839 (Canonicalize root var when making response from new solver)
 - #108856 (Remove DropAndReplace terminator)
 - #108882 (Tweak E0740)
 - #108898 (Set `LIBC_CHECK_CFG=1` when building Rust code in bootstrap)
 - #108911 (Improve rustdoc-gui/tester.js code a bit)
 - #108916 (Remove an unused return value in `rustc_hir_typeck`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 10, 2023
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 10, 2023

📌 Commit f3074c4 has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 10, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f3074c4 with merge 991610a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 10, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 991610a to master...

@bors bors merged commit 991610a into rust-lang:master Mar 10, 2023
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the rustup branch March 10, 2023 09:35
@bors bors mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.