Skip to content

Rustup? #6396

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2020
Merged

Rustup? #6396

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2020

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 commented Nov 28, 2020

Basically a rustup from an unknown source. I added a regression test (and slightly changed the lint), so this'll need a review.

changelog: Fix bug in [items_after_statements] wher it triggered, if items were separated by trailing semicolons.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Nov 28, 2020
Copy link
Member

@ebroto ebroto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ebroto
Copy link
Member

ebroto commented Nov 28, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2020

📌 Commit 0e5aee1 has been approved by ebroto

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 0e5aee1 with merge d75bc86...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: ebroto
Pushing d75bc86 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d75bc86 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the rustup branch November 28, 2020 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants