Skip to content

Fix doc heading of transmute_num_to_bytes #7848

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Oct 20, 2021

changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @flip1995

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 20, 2021
@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Thanks! It seems like we've missed that one 🙃

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2021

📌 Commit 9cf68e4 has been approved by xFrednet

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 9cf68e4 with merge 76150a4...

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

BTW. I intend to add a #[clippy::version] attribute to the lint declaration in #7813. This might also affect the lint parsing of rust-analyzer. I wanted to ping you once it's merged, but this is already a heads-up, now that you're here xD

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Oct 20, 2021

No worries, we kickoff the lint codegen manually every now and then so if something breaks format-wise that's no problem. Though that shouldn't affect us as we only read out the small description of lints and nothing else.

@xFrednet
Copy link
Member

Alright good to know 🙃

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: xFrednet
Pushing 76150a4 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 76150a4 into rust-lang:master Oct 20, 2021
@Veykril Veykril deleted the patch-1 branch October 20, 2021 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants