Tuple struct fields missing in documented signatures #13594

SiegeLord · 2014-04-18T15:08:03Z

E.g. a crate like this:

#![crate_type="lib"]
#![crate_id="test"]

pub struct A(int);
pub struct B(pub int);

Produces the following signatures:

pub struct A();
pub struct B();

I'd expect them to be something like:

pub struct A (
    // some fields omitted
);
pub struct B (int);

The fields of tuple structs recently gained the ability to have privacy associated with them, but rustdoc was not updated accodingly. This moves the struct field filtering to the rendering phase in order to preserve the ordering of struct fields to allow tuple structs to have their private fields printed as underscores. Closes rust-lang#13594

…kler The fields of tuple structs recently gained the ability to have privacy associated with them, but rustdoc was not updated accodingly. This moves the struct field filtering to the rendering phase in order to preserve the ordering of struct fields to allow tuple structs to have their private fields printed as underscores. Closes #13594

alexcrichton mentioned this issue Apr 20, 2014

rustdoc: Display tuple structs correctly #13639

Merged

bors closed this as completed in #13639 Apr 20, 2014

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Tuple struct fields missing in documented signatures #13594

Tuple struct fields missing in documented signatures #13594

SiegeLord commented Apr 18, 2014

Tuple struct fields missing in documented signatures #13594

Tuple struct fields missing in documented signatures #13594

Comments

SiegeLord commented Apr 18, 2014