We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would a pull request fixing the source code comments be appreciated? I noticed that there were a few here and there in the source code.
I mean notations like [T, ..n] instead of [T; n] which was added in rfc#520
[T, ..n]
[T; n]
I ask because it is a minor change, and perhaps there is already a system in place for cleanup. (Which I did not find in Contributing.md)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I think it will be appreciated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Agreed, I will r+ such a PR.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Seo Sanghyeon [email protected] wrote:
Yes, I think it will be appreciated. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #26074 (comment).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #26074 (comment).
(But given that this is not a bug, I'm giving it a close)
I have submitted my pr: #26099
No branches or pull requests
Would a pull request fixing the source code comments be appreciated? I noticed that there were a few here and there in the source code.
I mean notations like
[T, ..n]
instead of[T; n]
which was added in rfc#520I ask because it is a minor change, and perhaps there is already a system in place for cleanup. (Which I did not find in Contributing.md)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: