-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
/etc/ld.so.cache regeneration #5217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
The problem is that We should not be installing these files. One thing we could do to solve this easily might be to name these something like These files have caused confusion before. |
User confusion is better then my build system confusion though. Maybe it's really better to not install those files? And what about installing to |
Yes, I agree they should not be installed (see #4486 for a little more on this subject). Your package probably shouldn't install to |
Thank you. May I rename them myself to *.dummy ? |
Yes, absolutely you may, though I'm not sure exactly what you intend. I think the proper way to do this is to modify this bit of the makefiles that controls library naming. That |
rename is wrong solution... >>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
/sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/librustdoc.so.dummy is empty, not checked.
/sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/librusti.so.dummy is empty, not checked.
/sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/librust.so.dummy is empty, not checked.
/sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/librustc.so.dummy is empty, not checked.
/sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/librustpkg.so.dummy is empty, not checked. |
What about removing them after installation? |
The intent of renaming them during the build is that the install script will then not install them (since it doesn't, or shouldn't, install |
Fine. Here is the ebuild (gentoo build script) then https://github.com/Cynede/gentoo-rust/blob/master/dev-lang/rust/rust-9999.ebuild So I close this question because it's solved for myself even in hacky way. |
…ust-lang#5217) * fix(rustfmt): fix struct field formatting with doc comments present Fixes rust-lang#5215 * fix review feedbacks * add unit test without doc comment * move tests to a seperate file * add additional test cases * reintroduce a newline at the of test/souce/structs.rs
With source based package manager I do run regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache everytime I compile new package to system.
After make & make install rust I'm getting below messages there:
same about librustc.so , librust.so and other
To be honest I don't like it but what does it mean? How can I resolve this?
by the way I'm not sure if local is correct place for installed by package manager package so maybe I need to move package manually after make install?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: