rustpkg man page is a bit misleading #9221
Comments
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2013
Closes #9221. "rustpkg test" isn't implemented yet, so it shouldn't be in the manpage. Referring interested parties to the manual is probably the right thing for now; eventually, these documents should merge. /cc @catamorphism
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2022
…flip1995 Improvement for `equatable_if_let` fixes rust-lang#9221 This PR makes sure that enums or structs not implementing `PartialEq` trait but still using the `if let` patterns can be linted to be rewritten with `matches!`. If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be checked during review or continuous integration. - \[ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming] - \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file) - \[x] `cargo test` passes locally - \[ ] Executed `cargo dev update_lints` - \[ ] Added lint documentation - \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt` --- changelog: Improve [`equatable_if_let`] with additional `matches!` suggestions.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The rustpkg man page (which I didn't know existed until now) is slightly misleading in a few places -- for example, it mentions
git://URLs, which aren't supported yet. The man page should either note features that are not implemented yet, or else not mention those features at all and refer torustpkg.mdfor future plans.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: