Skip to content

various cleanups to try to reduce the use of spans inside method resolution #104394

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2022
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/callee.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -504,7 +504,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
// method lookup.
let Ok(pick) = self
.probe_for_name(
call_expr.span,
Mode::MethodCall,
segment.ident,
IsSuggestion(true),
Expand Down
77 changes: 38 additions & 39 deletions compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,17 +93,22 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
call_expr_id: hir::HirId,
allow_private: bool,
) -> bool {
let mode = probe::Mode::MethodCall;
match self.probe_for_name(
method_name.span,
mode,
probe::Mode::MethodCall,
method_name,
IsSuggestion(false),
self_ty,
call_expr_id,
ProbeScope::TraitsInScope,
) {
Ok(..) => true,
Ok(pick) => {
pick.maybe_emit_unstable_name_collision_hint(
self.tcx,
method_name.span,
call_expr_id,
);
true
}
Err(NoMatch(..)) => false,
Err(Ambiguity(..)) => true,
Err(PrivateMatch(..)) => allow_private,
Expand All @@ -125,10 +130,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
) {
let params = self
.probe_for_name(
method_name.span,
probe::Mode::MethodCall,
method_name,
IsSuggestion(false),
IsSuggestion(true),
self_ty,
call_expr.hir_id,
ProbeScope::TraitsInScope,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
args: &'tcx [hir::Expr<'tcx>],
) -> Result<MethodCallee<'tcx>, MethodError<'tcx>> {
let pick =
self.lookup_probe(span, segment.ident, self_ty, call_expr, ProbeScope::TraitsInScope)?;
self.lookup_probe(segment.ident, self_ty, call_expr, ProbeScope::TraitsInScope)?;

self.lint_dot_call_from_2018(self_ty, segment, span, call_expr, self_expr, &pick, args);

Expand All @@ -200,42 +204,38 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
.mk_ref(*region, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: *t_type, mutbl: mutability.invert() });
// We probe again to see if there might be a borrow mutability discrepancy.
match self.lookup_probe(
span,
segment.ident,
trait_type,
call_expr,
ProbeScope::TraitsInScope,
) {
Ok(ref new_pick) if *new_pick != pick => {
Ok(ref new_pick) if pick.differs_from(new_pick) => {
needs_mut = true;
}
_ => {}
}
}

// We probe again, taking all traits into account (not only those in scope).
let mut candidates = match self.lookup_probe(
span,
segment.ident,
self_ty,
call_expr,
ProbeScope::AllTraits,
) {
// If we find a different result the caller probably forgot to import a trait.
Ok(ref new_pick) if *new_pick != pick => vec![new_pick.item.container_id(self.tcx)],
Err(Ambiguity(ref sources)) => sources
.iter()
.filter_map(|source| {
match *source {
// Note: this cannot come from an inherent impl,
// because the first probing succeeded.
CandidateSource::Impl(def) => self.tcx.trait_id_of_impl(def),
CandidateSource::Trait(_) => None,
}
})
.collect(),
_ => Vec::new(),
};
let mut candidates =
match self.lookup_probe(segment.ident, self_ty, call_expr, ProbeScope::AllTraits) {
// If we find a different result the caller probably forgot to import a trait.
Ok(ref new_pick) if pick.differs_from(new_pick) => {
vec![new_pick.item.container_id(self.tcx)]
}
Err(Ambiguity(ref sources)) => sources
.iter()
.filter_map(|source| {
match *source {
// Note: this cannot come from an inherent impl,
// because the first probing succeeded.
CandidateSource::Impl(def) => self.tcx.trait_id_of_impl(def),
CandidateSource::Trait(_) => None,
}
})
.collect(),
_ => Vec::new(),
};
candidates.retain(|candidate| *candidate != self.tcx.parent(result.callee.def_id));

return Err(IllegalSizedBound(candidates, needs_mut, span));
Expand All @@ -247,23 +247,21 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, call_expr))]
pub fn lookup_probe(
&self,
span: Span,
method_name: Ident,
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
call_expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
scope: ProbeScope,
) -> probe::PickResult<'tcx> {
let mode = probe::Mode::MethodCall;
let self_ty = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(self_ty);
self.probe_for_name(
span,
mode,
let pick = self.probe_for_name(
probe::Mode::MethodCall,
method_name,
IsSuggestion(false),
self_ty,
call_expr.hir_id,
scope,
)
)?;
pick.maybe_emit_unstable_name_collision_hint(self.tcx, method_name.span, call_expr.hir_id);
Ok(pick)
}

pub(super) fn obligation_for_method(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -587,7 +585,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
}

let pick = self.probe_for_name(
span,
probe::Mode::Path,
method_name,
IsSuggestion(false),
Expand All @@ -596,6 +593,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
ProbeScope::TraitsInScope,
)?;

pick.maybe_emit_unstable_name_collision_hint(self.tcx, span, expr_id);

self.lint_fully_qualified_call_from_2018(
span,
method_name,
Expand Down
Loading