Skip to content

Custom MIR: Support storage statements #107067

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2023
Merged

Custom MIR: Support storage statements #107067

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2023

Conversation

tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

@tmiasko tmiasko commented Jan 19, 2023

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 19, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 19, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jan 19, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 19, 2023

📌 Commit ca3d55e has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 19, 2023
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2023
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2023
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#107105 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-rkz9t7r, r=matth…
04a41f8 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106783 (Recover labels written as identifiers)
 - rust-lang#106973 (Don't treat closures from other crates as local)
 - rust-lang#106979 (Document how to get the type of a default associated type)
 - rust-lang#107053 (signal update string representation for haiku.)
 - rust-lang#107058 (Recognise double-equals homoglyph)
 - rust-lang#107067 (Custom MIR: Support storage statements)
 - rust-lang#107076 (Added const-generic ui test case for issue rust-lang#106419)
 - rust-lang#107091 (Fix broken format strings in `infer.ftl`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 66a9006 into rust-lang:master Jan 20, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 20, 2023
@tmiasko tmiasko deleted the custom-mir-storage-statements branch January 20, 2023 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@oli-obk oli-obk

Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.68.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@tmiasko @rustbot @oli-obk @bors