Skip to content

make mir dataflow graphviz dumps opt-in #112617

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lqd
Copy link
Member

@lqd lqd commented Jun 14, 2023

This should save some MIR traversals and allocations that are not really needed.

Small win but noticeable locally. Let's see what LTO/PGO say.

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 14, 2023
@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Jun 14, 2023

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 14, 2023

⌛ Trying commit 9395e27 with merge ec22fd018cf26f422e5014619d319a33e12a7f27...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 14, 2023

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: ec22fd018cf26f422e5014619d319a33e12a7f27 (ec22fd018cf26f422e5014619d319a33e12a7f27)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ec22fd018cf26f422e5014619d319a33e12a7f27): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 9
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 9
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 9

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.3% [3.3%, 3.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.3% [-0.1%, 2.8%] 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 648.428s -> 649.822s (0.21%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 14, 2023
@lqd lqd marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2023 16:05
@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Jun 14, 2023

While the feature seems useful for debugging, it need not impact the happy path. So I think this change makes some sense, what do you think: r? @tmiasko.

@tmiasko
Copy link
Contributor

tmiasko commented Jun 18, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 18, 2023

📌 Commit 9395e27 has been approved by tmiasko

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 19, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 9395e27 with merge c911e08...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 19, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tmiasko
Pushing c911e08 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 19, 2023
@bors bors merged commit c911e08 into rust-lang:master Jun 19, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.72.0 milestone Jun 19, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c911e08): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.7%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-0.6%, -0.4%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.6% [0.6%, 0.7%] 3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 656.587s -> 656.978s (0.06%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jun 19, 2023
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jun 19, 2023

The helloworld changes are noise, it also happened on other PRs recently.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Jun 19, 2023
@lqd lqd deleted the dump-mir-dataflow branch June 19, 2023 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants