-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rollup of 5 pull requests #116006
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #116006
Conversation
This was copy-pasted from the current state of the `stable` branch
…unused-to-predicate, r=oli-obk clean up unneeded `ToPredicate` impls Part of rust-lang#107250. Removed all totally unused impls. And inlined two impls not need to satisify trait bound. r? `@oli-obk`
coverage: Remove debug code from the instrumentor The coverage instrumentor has an entire module full of complex code that is only used for debugging. And as I continue to work on coverage, I keep finding that this debug code is constantly causing more trouble than it's worth. It's deeply entangled with current implementation details, such that making any non-trivial change to the instrumentor usually requires major changes to the debug code. And so far I have personally not found any of this debug code to be *useful*. In light of that situation, I'd like to try just ripping all of it out. If I spend any more time dealing with coverage debug code, I want it to be because I'm writing new and useful tools, not dutifully maintaining a boat-anchor that quite plausibly isn't being used by anyone at all. --- r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage --- [Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Removing.20debug.20code.20from.20the.20coverage.20instrumentor)
…out, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: add test cases, and fix, search tabs layout jank ## Before ### Resizing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1593513/24bb5f2b-f6bd-4ed8-91e1-f9ff63d1acee ### Typing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1593513/145f53e1-42eb-4b2a-adba-7c9ab44b0aa4 ## After ### Resizing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1593513/acc10a55-e83e-43e6-8604-5dfcb9ae3141 ### Typing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1593513/09d6d389-e24f-428f-933f-83d9075f15a2
…albini Ensure `build/tmp` exists in `rustdoc_themes::get_themes` This causes failures in ferrocene's CI as `build/tmp` might not exist at this point, causing the following expect to fail here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/4b91288484569dd59c9a996ae45e08ae9527abc1/src/tools/rustdoc-themes/main.rs#L24
RELEASES.md: Add missing patch releases This was copy-pasted from the current state of the `stable` branch see https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/241545-t-release/topic/1.2E71.2E1/near/382524871
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: e3811a785e In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (4f22692): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 632.207s -> 632.239s (0.01%) |
Successful merges:
ToPredicate
impls #115566 (clean up unneededToPredicate
impls)build/tmp
exists inrustdoc_themes::get_themes
#115991 (Ensurebuild/tmp
exists inrustdoc_themes::get_themes
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup