Skip to content

Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness #120763

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2024

Conversation

Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

The vast majority of exhaustiveness tests are in tests/ui/pattern, this is what I've been using for years. This PR is me telling x suggest about that.

cc @Ezrashaw

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 8, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or
reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 8, 2024
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2024

📌 Commit 2b95b68 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117740 (Add some links and minor explanatory comments to `std::fmt`)
 - rust-lang#118307 (Remove an unneeded helper from the tuple library code)
 - rust-lang#119242 (Suggest less bug-prone construction of Duration in docs)
 - rust-lang#119449 (Fix `clippy::correctness` in the library)
 - rust-lang#120307 (core: add Duration constructors)
 - rust-lang#120459 (Document various I/O descriptor/handle conversions)
 - rust-lang#120729 (Update mdbook to 0.4.37)
 - rust-lang#120763 (Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness)
 - rust-lang#120906 (Remove myself from some review rotations)
 - rust-lang#120916 (Subtree update of ` rust-analyzer`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117740 (Add some links and minor explanatory comments to `std::fmt`)
 - rust-lang#118307 (Remove an unneeded helper from the tuple library code)
 - rust-lang#119242 (Suggest less bug-prone construction of Duration in docs)
 - rust-lang#119449 (Fix `clippy::correctness` in the library)
 - rust-lang#120307 (core: add Duration constructors)
 - rust-lang#120459 (Document various I/O descriptor/handle conversions)
 - rust-lang#120729 (Update mdbook to 0.4.37)
 - rust-lang#120763 (Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness)
 - rust-lang#120906 (Remove myself from some review rotations)
 - rust-lang#120916 (Subtree update of ` rust-analyzer`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 040ecbf into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 11, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120763 - Nadrieril:suggest-patterns, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Suggest pattern tests when modifying exhaustiveness

The vast majority of exhaustiveness tests are in `tests/ui/pattern`, this is what I've been using for years. This PR is me telling `x suggest` about that.

cc `@Ezrashaw`
@Nadrieril Nadrieril deleted the suggest-patterns branch February 11, 2024 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants