-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rollup of 6 pull requests #124109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #124109
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment was historically inside a block guarded by `if let Some(otherwise_block) = otherwise`. When rust-lang#120978 made the otherwise block non-optional, it also flattened that region of code. Doing so left this comment awkwardly stranded above an unrelated line of code, without its original context. We can restore that context by moving it above the declaration of `otherwise`.
In llvm/llvm-project@9067070 they ended up largely reverting llvm/llvm-project@e817966. This means the change we did in rust-lang/rust@b378059 is now only corrct for LLVM 18...so we have to adjust again. @rustbot label: +llvm-main
…n, r=notriddle Fix copy path button Currently, on all nightly docs, clicking on the "copy path" button triggers a JS error. It's because changes in rust-lang#123706 forgot to update the JS (it contained an image before but not anymore). I had to make some small changes in the CSS to fix the display when the button was clicked as well. r? `@notriddle`
…leanups, r=Nadrieril Match ergonomics 2024: miscellaneous code cleanups - Store `ByRef` instead of `BindingAnnotation` in `PatInfo` - Rename `BindingAnnotation` to `BindingMode` r? `@Nadrieril` cc rust-lang#123076 `@rustbot` label A-patterns
Move confusing comment about otherwise blocks in `lower_match_tree` This comment was historically inside a block guarded by `if let Some(otherwise_block) = otherwise`. When rust-lang#120978 made the “otherwise block” non-optional, it also flattened that region of code. Doing so left this comment awkwardly stranded above an unrelated line of code, without its original context. We can restore that context by moving it above the declaration of `otherwise`. r? `@Nadrieril`
…=jieyouxu Remove libc from more tests The goal here is to trim down the number of tests that depend on libc from the sysroot to make rust-lang#123938 more plausible. This PR is a few simple cases that I missed in rust-lang#123943.
…uviper llvm: update riscv target feature to match LLVM 19 In llvm/llvm-project@9067070 they ended up largely reverting llvm/llvm-project@e817966. This means the change we did in rust-lang/rust@b378059 is now only corrct for LLVM 18...so we have to adjust again. `@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
fix: make `str::from_raw_parts_mut` `mut` `str::from_raw_parts_mut` wasn't actually `mut` rust-lang#119206
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124041 (Fix copy path button) - rust-lang#124047 (Match ergonomics 2024: miscellaneous code cleanups) - rust-lang#124064 (Move confusing comment about otherwise blocks in `lower_match_tree`) - rust-lang#124072 (Remove libc from more tests) - rust-lang#124090 (llvm: update riscv target feature to match LLVM 19) - rust-lang#124100 (fix: make `str::from_raw_parts_mut` `mut`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
lower_match_tree
#124064 (Move confusing comment about otherwise blocks inlower_match_tree
)str::from_raw_parts_mut
mut
#124100 (fix: makestr::from_raw_parts_mut
mut
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup