Skip to content

Use a consistent way to filter out bounds instead of splitting it into three places #126471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -239,24 +239,19 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
return Ok(());
}

let all_bounds = stack
let bounds = stack
.obligation
.param_env
.caller_bounds()
.iter()
.filter(|p| !p.references_error())
.filter_map(|p| p.as_trait_clause());

// Micro-optimization: filter out predicates relating to different traits.
let matching_bounds =
all_bounds.filter(|p| p.def_id() == stack.obligation.predicate.def_id());
.filter_map(|p| p.as_trait_clause())
// Micro-optimization: filter out predicates relating to different traits.
.filter(|p| p.def_id() == stack.obligation.predicate.def_id())
.filter(|p| p.polarity() == stack.obligation.predicate.polarity());

// Keep only those bounds which may apply, and propagate overflow if it occurs.
for bound in matching_bounds {
if bound.skip_binder().polarity != stack.obligation.predicate.skip_binder().polarity {
continue;
}

for bound in bounds {
// FIXME(oli-obk): it is suspicious that we are dropping the constness and
// polarity here.
let wc = self.where_clause_may_apply(stack, bound.map_bound(|t| t.trait_ref))?;
Expand Down
Loading