Stop using MoveDataParamEnv for places that don't need a param-env

[compiler-errors]

I think not threading through a ParamEnv makes it clearer that these functions don't do anything particularly "type systems"-y.

r? cjgillot

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #125443) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

[cjgillot]

R=me after rebase

[compiler-errors]

@bors r=cjgillot rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit f990239 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[Kobzol]

@rust-timer build 2979c42

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (2979c42): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.6%	[1.6%, 1.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 4.5%, secondary 3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.5%	[4.5%, 4.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[3.1%, 3.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	4.5%	[4.5%, 4.5%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 769.793s -> 769.839s (0.01%)
Artifact size: 331.78 MiB -> 331.86 MiB (0.03%)