-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path. #139364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
5
tests/ui/typeck/auxiliary/suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible-a.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
//@ edition: 2021 | ||
|
||
pub trait Foo { | ||
fn foo(); | ||
} |
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions
14
tests/ui/typeck/auxiliary/suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible-b.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
// ignore-tidy-linelength | ||
//@ edition: 2021 | ||
//@ aux-crate:suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_a=suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible-a.rs | ||
|
||
pub struct Bar; | ||
|
||
impl __DocHidden::Foo for Bar { | ||
fn foo() {} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[doc(hidden)] | ||
pub mod __DocHidden { | ||
pub use suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_a::Foo; | ||
} |
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions
11
tests/ui/typeck/suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible.rs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
// ignore-tidy-linelength | ||
//@ edition: 2021 | ||
//@ aux-crate:suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_a=suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible-a.rs | ||
//@ aux-crate:suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_b=suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible-b.rs | ||
|
||
use suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_b::Bar; | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
Bar::foo(); | ||
//~^ ERROR: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Bar` in the current scope [E0599] | ||
} |
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
15
tests/ui/typeck/suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible.stderr
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Bar` in the current scope | ||
--> $DIR/suggest-trait-reexported-as-not-doc-visible.rs:9:10 | ||
| | ||
LL | Bar::foo(); | ||
| ^^^ function or associated item not found in `Bar` | ||
| | ||
= help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is in scope | ||
help: trait `Foo` which provides `foo` is implemented but not in scope; perhaps you want to import it | ||
| | ||
LL + use suggest_trait_reexported_as_not_doc_visible_a::Foo; | ||
| | ||
|
||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error | ||
|
||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0599`. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these the only places where this new flag is suitable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regarding this issue, it seems yes to me. I haven't checked if other places where the flag is suitable exist. Should I apply the flag to other places in this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know. If you can do a quick check, that would be great. If you don't know, you can leave it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've checked quickly, but I didn't find any.