Skip to content

PassWrapper: adapt for llvm/llvm-project@d3d856ad8469 #140400

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

durin42
Copy link
Contributor

@durin42 durin42 commented Apr 28, 2025

LLVM 21 moves to making it more explicit what this function call is doing, but nothing has changed behaviorally, so for now we just adjust to using the new name of the function.

@rustbot label llvm-main

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 28, 2025

r? @cuviper

rustbot has assigned @cuviper.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) labels Apr 28, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

LLVM 21 moves to making it more explicit what this function call is
doing, but nothing has changed behaviorally, so for now we just adjust
to using the new name of the function.

@rustbot label llvm-main
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants